IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rfc-i] RFC Format FAQ - updated

rse at rfc-editor.org (Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)) Wed, 02 July 2014 17:52 UTC

From: "rse at rfc-editor.org"
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:52:02 -0700
Subject: [rfc-i] RFC Format FAQ - updated
In-Reply-To: <A4902E30-DDEA-48D4-BFCE-F2216E931F41@fugue.com>
References: <53B315A4.8090206@rfc-editor.org> <53B32237.6070405@alum.mit.edu> <801295D5-E8A9-4A62-802A-49AEB3FD735F@vpnc.org> <53B37A30.5080009@att.com> <53B38415.9070900@alum.mit.edu> <53B3A8B2.4050902@gmx.de> <53B3F8DD.7040607@att.com> <53B3FA8A.5020303@gmx.de> <A4902E30-DDEA-48D4-BFCE-F2216E931F41@fugue.com>
Message-ID: <53B446C2.2000008@rfc-editor.org>

On 7/2/14, 5:29 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2014, at 8:26 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>>> *) add the SVG grammar to the v3 grammar
>>
>> Nooooo...
> 
> I thought we'd defined a restricted set of SVG we can use.   Why _not_ have it in the grammar?   If we don't say what's allowed in the "ANY" block, that could get scary, and if we do say, why not say in the grammar?
> 


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brownlee-svg-rfc/

-Heather

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email