[rfc-i] author/organization = "unaffiliated"?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 06 November 2019 05:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C96120B05 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:57:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.082, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46iP59NjSbNn for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:57:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D47120AB0 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:57:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF91F4073A; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:57:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2328F40738 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:57:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O4AXTZo0XLsa for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5318F4073A for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:57:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1573019861; bh=PN+M4D3KQ+yR0wPgjBDV2OirfDOKFPQwDS9BV36dvHw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:To:From:Subject:Date; b=BSzgrdD15+2i7uZr48iezw2TFmJMKbaKyrw8Q+plRlxIRmgJjpXgNhG3jn0/48/eD fWClVdyw6dR/1G+78Nq0VzRH0GPCdzt5JbbQrbrrH2FWU8N4QPDZortqdDlRrFD1Iw CqzXJ2Nlz/nvGFFvHdMyb8szpVTqwJYzNGZi/n34=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.151.210]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M8hZJ-1iWvHY27bF-004mlS for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:57:41 +0100
To: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <b05bc9c5-6061-8713-39f7-a4348aaa378f@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:57:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:10AjRCJqn/lvv2znWzqb1V8mLnlbIxCpJnhoPgAijs+SshcV9uK u3WNmAZSnYEFhp2tAGU28GnrTyOVZu5qCoF/WWn6RS0Z9dTN3xIkjZElJfhE08sKYPlcbx6 mTA4shbgJDM01gQhmGxu7isvsHl06om62Eix4ud5MnMDfZjTzt9nm4J+OSIMfERfiRJs3Z8 rGR8HrUlk7Nb0Z3ryFzqw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:TK+AYOqFJtI=:k+cUTr5HAs5OyfYjIxw11T 70wfust7RjOFjVRL4zuntPa3LzwHCMuIflgzHdmLaQRSfJAkdFfvHmLtQBdHxYF/7j5lJDhNs 8afP05/VAqACynYQA/R2BJsHr19JKu2pgLVzRknhCT61KcFz0ezmpKpUm9hn9135GPZWhLhav 4VRtWt481RXpYC4xU/bSDXPWAtgbpaDsZEkKppQgeCV9dN0ykHMUj25zRFvwcCVq4QKNnNhSh OfiIlEPIydK70k/FlLMdNvX1/iEzQ24tAuY40hJdimufuJINy7w0Vo3mRTq5CzbHZ/6RocCBI OZdrWzeBQ4DhYV605UkPO4ZmFy3zhNzKrvvn0iqY7AoELX18A06ar/05aOZZ9lC+8GbACrIrb 2TtrtYNZL4GErgCWavgkvMioqmtGbjhdF5+UchQsqxHSAVAN2c7Yn1uNJbg+zpCQueYb9LMg7 SwuZWsmZ6ueAoP4Muzy78TzUuWy2tCwytZqFpfKvZqgwpAPTQX2gCZakXlcUTrwMy2UzcBDLB 6NCEVVXeauv/Tai5b94ihfTOqzgzY+cDjFpud2GdcbstQpZbL1adFy789+J9kK4/RRoTQHOBw i2IB2YYfnGvL7rkgPxROkw1gjHQBogSr58KAhvn/PDqFGVp3xwX+jzO3gbqWJgFWeCSBWL6sa 8YNxvOUAlyBvSzHWuBcwFWAHIVI7Qdzomi7JR7ZulELjNCNTNjRcuA80SSp45e0qjaVI3y/9y YwUo7vc6/PLq31MEu7yw7LCGe6aDdI+dnsAd15S8zX+QV4kq8TAQUdZruJ06rnB9BCMzmGDXE gE+PHXh/slu+Wlz0IMvKyhf3o3RbsKasoIqI1qtELNQHlP61AP5QehAI4Itd9p+DB75pIZSxg GDn+OJIQXtprYcCtnob1dRiV45lGgueWDieMiUUf9wJ6oGEDK05zKZ+v3S3/fnrG7i6Nh7YFO Zx082OzxJpEWt96Iw8XuFf1ziEAqvk3YutftPmUcTgmAnZftLBQCrXz4sN827MAhjPsZU+mB3 2scs+9BcN2tIG4Y9PE8b3L3ou3XQomPsv7+9AH2iA5Q/a9gkDxF1L9rNKX4hTcefyvwb/DKn6 ta+8eY2I2nqjVzWUtJKSqPNoYPAstfJgKySxKX8d67nRZ09MZ18aumpUU0uhmD/hnNOTGpw6m 6WxltY2utP+X8DZWBIIFb/DbYivalpTryaTJrOaWcnK637wcE5UsdZpKMNR4J+MOPctz/rFY2 VQT6BBplZQSGFXdxF9ljKKnNHBMNuTFYyHxPzD94/Jw6YB5VgtpKbq83UefE=
Subject: [rfc-i] author/organization = "unaffiliated"?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi there,

I recently saw a few cases where authors put in "unaffiliated" (or
something similar) as organization name.

Is this something that the style guide should mention? Should it
recommend *not* to set anything here when there's nothing to set?

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest