[rfc-i] <aside/> inside <dd/> and <li/>
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com> Thu, 29 April 2021 00:00 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953CC3A25DD; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9vFAVa9k5lQ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B1093A25D5; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D686DF4081E; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28298F4081E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crwo0v1T22p4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com (mail-io1-xd44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00D77F4081C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id b10so6387000iot.4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nr1nUu8g4WTGOOOrgP18M+55costN2gH50WIGxJiJ6c=; b=MYGbHDYyuiXGB4TV3NBEgyWwvVzD447U0UMVj798AiBRg0EPYlHhm+5S9vm2jVw3iT vPdXqwUAcGHUFLtNBeVB5dAY7BNgMVe0iElnrlV9N+ImYySCUdeVZujQOE9nAL+tkEvw +U2/VvoRrMCXsxbkFEvXxI3Uqw69LP1wj35q4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nr1nUu8g4WTGOOOrgP18M+55costN2gH50WIGxJiJ6c=; b=sEvdj4h0Dw0JJhxNBxlJ4ZiXx73TCu1W3FNEjUM5ivBRj9lQL8pJD28PFTDLDUB434 lrEGat+yzUl3B0cSmfZUEgcdQ+fr9qULP1XryH89VHcCPCrqXztAJTHoCHQ+pCOqbqTx N3LE5+an0TOfFtnxoqwysIslk2vKDu8i3Sbpl9SGCGBY6HwK7YPlhCG7NwfPyCTU78/o EZvYfAwZR/WUdDPdUd7Yf0c1kZ+uggKcEnZ9p6PBVtSHpm9qZc82jU+w524q3fRs+alU KGgyJxMCjH8NX4H56DRt0q5S8rjafZfaQucHzYJzIRWGWNN8MmUm5xEN129/N/wHXGFl or6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Eg7cS+8jr9gQeca1q0UuZ4pdSpYfkYxxf7RHBAQypW8qdIIBA ZMcJXA47OLmy3bIZes2aMOtwEw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyG7qikRo9+61axZUFyvsdYXEhDvwY78caH0+et9W1jBF1U0TkBPG29ZwP5Q3FDp+9S1ZBzrg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:bcb:: with SMTP id g11mr29916062jad.144.1619654414321; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dragon.local (c-73-78-113-156.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.78.113.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b8sm571931iob.30.2021.04.28.17.00.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <178257f8-7525-5a84-3c4f-37b3b9f06157@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:00:12 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: [rfc-i] <aside/> inside <dd/> and <li/>
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
The xml2rfc tool supports [1] <aside/> inside <dd/> (which seems useful or at least not harmful but needs to be documented) and for the sake of consistency we might also want to support [2] <aside/> inside <li/>. Do folks on this list have any concerns? Peter [1] https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/192 [2] https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/196 _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] <aside/> inside <dd/> and <li/> Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rfc-i] <aside/> inside <dd/> and <li/> Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] <aside/> inside <dd/> and <li/> Peter Saint-Andre