IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] What are current rules on non-ascii in documents?

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 15 February 2024 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F357CC151551 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:40:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HaA3s5X93Bdz for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0A9C151542 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id C36AC805DC; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:40:19 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1708004421; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=U62CKrwVMLq4ZBjCvJJugdbHuShRIdTNtINgxL7/3rM=; b=aefFuHLQUvTKQgOPWH56fGJAlZqg1W0GMQO9cMLECdy/W471JKACPNIFuHb0kk/hXDyYju ILfB9O872In8UDUxJG9u2nvp57CqTyoVlZE+0b32/H6B6VcIl3FtrY7+xi9Fh5vEyBF46l Evoaq0HCkpVyzbBckhXyaxHTBIMsqz3jFo5ZTxKHWRi+6DjfHR0MJtX1ZCy+Wz0gko1UD9 Z1QjUI09uJ6chTWMzsxikSZErNW0cpop8I+NJDGgB2VdR8BB7jgGBj8OmOYUOe+FRu8CUE rd9s5aaqRO6J1HSyBqa2XiuxybNPDbIJcfrFxfN7SpnRCDo585d/lQSNDUlkuw==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C19903F-5A2F-4E44-B18A-C95FF6DCC8B1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <2705E5C9-8F1E-4557-88E0-B328CE784EF0@tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:40:17 +0200
Cc: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <5049CA18-4820-4BF6-8A02-5C8EDDD5F6E6@eggert.org>
References: <3C54D12E-89E0-43BF-ADBB-26F66081E55A@tzi.org> <883024E7-ECFE-483E-AAC5-B08BBFB75DA2@bangj.com> <2705E5C9-8F1E-4557-88E0-B328CE784EF0@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/OWNyQ8g36FCL37teTOEmQ8fW-dI>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] What are current rules on non-ascii in documents?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:40:29 -0000

Hi,

On Feb 15, 2024, at 07:24, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> PS. Now if I knew why my (chromium-based) browser does this:
> 
> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
> 
> Looks fine in emacs (using “Hack” font):

fonts are a big problem here. With some of utftex's more esoteric math notations, the only font that really works is https://juliamono.netlify.app/

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email