Re: [rfc-i] <artwork/> vs <sourcecode/> - this is a change request
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 29 May 2021 06:03 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4995A3A0EEB; Fri, 28 May 2021 23:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYBWs1LtyB3N; Fri, 28 May 2021 23:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C293A193F; Fri, 28 May 2021 23:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4992F40755; Fri, 28 May 2021 23:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9939AF40755 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 23:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VO5JGQbvu7Ko for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 23:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4C4FF40750 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 23:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FsWF85jc6z316j; Sat, 29 May 2021 08:03:08 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <F718AA0A-1314-417E-B001-1D0FBF7821FB@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 08:03:08 +0200
Message-Id: <D11332FE-D2C3-45BC-B72D-65B0CA10F61C@tzi.org>
References: <92466d37-c308-8e5a-fff1-a8ea9c471937@gmail.com> <9E40EBD4-64A8-4F4C-A736-A6065C7C3EF2@tzi.org> <F718AA0A-1314-417E-B001-1D0FBF7821FB@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] <artwork/> vs <sourcecode/> - this is a change request
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
On 29. May 2021, at 07:56, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > There's an open issue for this, but I forget where the repo is. Found it: https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/195 Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] <artwork/> vs <sourcecode/> - this is a c… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] <artwork/> vs <sourcecode/> - this is… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] <artwork/> vs <sourcecode/> - this is… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] <artwork/> vs <sourcecode/> - this is… Carsten Bormann