IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Sooo has anyone tried actually printing the new HTML style??

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 11 August 2017 04:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C990C126C2F for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LjHc7LnOsvo1 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4BB12426E for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01529B817DB; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7584FB817DB for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEOkKhsDGr5V for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B148B817DA for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id d17so11429526lfe.0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=JLh1bMA8sL+3nHknTCklqCSyiDsDGZEo8r8Lq+SLAwM=; b=Cnn8SLoSjzj3e5RvSVbJPdTg4ZLmXhcXA6GJKcqti3P1EMAGYo7+wVSff9M0yJVAqN YPjLscrSKTZ7Td2JLI98j64BzVF70XK1QdSk75wpmJ2iNxRO2eJto8fIArN5B73wTGVQ Aw0XIshR/ztgZodkjjL0letkdZ0Gw5bAAbkTfIxg+C1amKJLHCGTPHowYnUUyzjLViO3 Lr3U0EZEOizoZbxGj6j/b97O4DrYh1rB+UiG15bhpIbDDevIvyBU9S5wq8nTB/2gW3o7 AS6q0fWSsmQBjnrJFEQfOjtpYAfGP5OTOAFCAA+LFKJeUwXrDV6HfEEh74dSrIT8FyaM 1szw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JLh1bMA8sL+3nHknTCklqCSyiDsDGZEo8r8Lq+SLAwM=; b=Lh6GJANiLe2qerxr+6wvyrjQlbnXwomtxyVMMfPVUkosHsF+bIXT/KXZP5OJxxEW5I L1dL1WWqVz7+gyG7OTP6Ee3Y5DLoZjF8lvN+xqgtHkV6QKB4+FONCazTBdnhbaPqAEam rfaGhE0LKQ5XtdV52m7nqjZILiPTVPzwjuB4Fi3HXX9u2cVHrGdtXA9ImS9nkkqcpyIK P2jTiAB1GD2bVGa6oDCroDPx2xiec1Pi0CQcv6knAczA36jTJv4D4xSSNoPqOEN4ZcAi 2W/EBH4VhabzAZ4upaXxq+FRdDRcQXQ0uwty5KNrpuksAafnxfD8x/150IIGf5A6wmZ8 dUoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hiehgjkbZyVYVe/Kw3oF17Dsugv/iFblZLhn0cB6ljxzmlVTgr 5iEnfx4mr/kL55RRHq8gYTQiHmUMkN8F
X-Received: by 10.25.79.5 with SMTP id d5mr4369919lfb.160.1502424829304; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.142.199 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUwZ2s-DiN_DiZhyjoNk6X54270Ob1jv+2B8YhQx99_Ww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+LwiJ35J8-4_iJxkGqF8O+g-NN=YPL+1eyjSmD1pdQifDag@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUwZ2s-DiN_DiZhyjoNk6X54270Ob1jv+2B8YhQx99_Ww@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:13:48 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vXnOtHj_DxHK_QuEc_vZxXSx800
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwjavkKWsh+VOGKiZJUyAU-qWHt7Xm2PAafaii=bfovYPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Sooo has anyone tried actually printing the new HTML style??
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4717269356690635852=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

I was having issues on Chrome and Edge. Commenting out these lines did the
trick.

  body {
    font-family: 'Noto Serif', "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    width: 100%;
  }


On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Worked for me.  Firefox on Windows.  I can produce a PDF, though it's
> a tad large.
>
> On 11 August 2017 at 12:54, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
> wrote:
> > I just completed my draft for the naming workshop. Seems to work fine on
> the
> > screen but when I print... white text on white... argh!!!
> >
> > I am using the stylesheet from this with very minor tweakage:
> > https://rfc-format.github.io/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/
> >
> >
> > Anyone skilled in stylesheetery?
> >
> > Example attached. This was produced from a Word document source. The next
> > step being to generate xml2rfcv2 and v3 output, then markdown.
> >
> > I believe that the tool should work correctly with markdown or xml2rfc v3
> > input.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list
> > rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> >
>

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email