[rfc-i] Number of submission formats
ynir at checkpoint.com (Yoav Nir) Fri, 18 January 2013 21:53 UTC
From: "ynir at checkpoint.com"
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:53:29 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] Number of submission formats
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOhpq3_vpZkOuY4jqfyOn0_kxrgyTWVC3xaqNLzN9M9Qzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50F98E23.9010400@rfc-editor.org> <20130118184540.79096.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAK3OfOhpq3_vpZkOuY4jqfyOn0_kxrgyTWVC3xaqNLzN9M9Qzg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC30277211198943A@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com>
On Jan 18, 2013, at 11:30 PM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, John Levine <johnl at taugh.com> wrote: >> >> Heck, no. There is a canonical output format, the one to which we >> point if someone wants to know what is "the RFC." > > You misunderstood. > > Today's I-D upload tool has several input formats allowed, one is > required. The .xml input is only really useful when a) you want > others to be able to see it (and contribute XML changes) or b) the I-D > is about to get sent to the RFC-Editor queue, in which case the editor > can just... find it there, saving a step in the process. or c) you want the reflow-able html to be generated, like so: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-williams-websec-session-continue-prob-00.html > But the RFC-Editor will also take nroff, so being able to submit > either or both of those is useful. > >> There are acceptable input formats. Currently there are, as I >> understand it, 2 1/2 input formats, line printer format similar to the >> current output format, xml2rfc, and maybe nroff if it uses the same >> coding the production people use. > > I can't imagine the RFC-Editor being happy to work with the formatted > .txt only as an input. Say I edited an I-D that way, formatting and > paginating by hand (don't laugh, I used to, though I had a script to > do the pagination)? They'll take just the txt version, although they'll grumble. RFC 4478 had no nroff or xml source. >> I don't see any reason to change that structure. [...] > > Paul is the one that proposed a change. I was trying to get that > change narrowed and clarified. Currently, Internet Drafts look very similar to RFCs. I think we'll want to keep that similarity. Yoav
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Nico Williams
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Nico Williams
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Nico Williams
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Marc Blanchet
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats John Levine
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Marc Blanchet
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats John R Levine
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Marc Blanchet
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Martin Rex
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Nico Williams
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Yoav Nir
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Nico Williams
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Nico Williams
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Nico Williams
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Nico Williams
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Nico Williams
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats John Levine
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] Number of submission formats Martin Rex