[rfc-i] RFC9115 errata html rendering

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 22 February 2024 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CB0C14F6E8; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:52:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kNkUGPU81ipy; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A782C15154A; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:51:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5723A38993; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:51:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fkaYVNHDVUL7; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEDE38992; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:51:52 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1708638712; bh=ogk6I1XfkC32y/TmeBO66+sj2gAZOMNsTVIXpLNX6Mg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=xO4g9wElSWytBHqIJgFxsCxTdNwjy1OTJs4VVWH4IMLdV4hhxSQIsYWah8Lm01uXu Kkt5Cpy8RinV8Ke3Zsx+kbzCQlr9VQjPQfCbBPLnIU+uHOoJ0h2QqfrVJdY+6FFoDJ Ana+980P3WzgbCRJ73R83KlKjMROUTBKoKdQEOsqr9EthfY/qegzusVG4+w5CNQpqf Q8t5WsbGhN7/eU0dJFK+Mr8XzbLCybZA3fUwfrY/NfpOo6p6E2GC6EGLhX/jpZH2/w byRoScD0D5E3VXXaeEs/0ZMFNsRvcaAkPM2+a/R5hqvU8CtCKLzP00Yapna+M68mI+ GZT+lhXIzodJg==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170EC12BE; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:51:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:51:52 -0500
Message-ID: <13117.1708638712@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/X5OfdwDeaa3EumADBsQ5wKlkkHM>
Subject: [rfc-i] RFC9115 errata html rendering
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 21:52:01 -0000

I arrived to read RFC9115 after following the reference newly published 9535.
At https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9115 I see the option to read the HTML
with errata applied at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/inline-errata/rfc9115.html

But, it's not really the HTML version.  There are no internal links, no
right-hand table of contents, etc.  It's a poorly HTML-ized txt output.

I'm wondering what's going on here.  I don't mind if the errata version is
the text version, but it seems to be advertised as the HTML version.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide