[rfc-i] Documents at AUTH48 which have been cleared by all authors
pekkas at netcore.fi (Pekka Savola) Tue, 15 August 2006 07:12 UTC
From: "pekkas at netcore.fi"
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:12:57 +0300
Subject: [rfc-i] Documents at AUTH48 which have been cleared by all authors
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608150955590.18238@netcore.fi>
Hi, I'd like to ask a question about AUTH48 state updates. It seems that with some documents (especially with normative references to other docs in the queue) where all the authors have signed off the document don't get moved out of AUTH48 at least in a timely fashion (e.g., a week). One example of this is draft-ietf-mboned-mroutesec, but I've seen similar in the past. I'd speculate this might be due to at least one of: a) RFC-editor hasn't context-switched back to that document yet, and marking "all AUTH48 signoffs received" (e.g., removing 'AUTH48' from queue designation) has no priority in the document handling, and/or b) Documents which refer normatively to other documents in the queue which are also at AUTH48 don't get moved to any one other state until all the documents get AUTH48 cleared because there is no intermediate state past AUTH48 to move into [1]. Hence, for higher AUTH48 timing precision and greater visilibility of who has the token on what documents, it might be better to have a clearer delineation between "in AUTH48, waiting for authors" and "ready to publish (but possibly waiting for something to happen to other documents first)". Btw, mailto URL in http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html is incorrect. [1] ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-editor/rfc-editor-process.gif -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
- [rfc-i] Documents at AUTH48 which have been clear… Pekka Savola
- [rfc-i] Documents at AUTH48 which have been clear… Bob Braden
- [rfc-i] Documents at AUTH48 which have been clear… Bill Fenner