IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] RFC 8661 in AUTH48, was: [xml2rfc-dev] [v3] Please help review v3 files

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 18 September 2019 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C8A120046 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMKTgOVBqPUC for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714C1120AA0 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E53B80B88; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742D3B80B88; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mcujlMbtIyMl; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A3D8B80B84; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1568838151; bh=sIlOQ9VAfSnH5OehVzDUq0Kfo3I4SGxJnLgPTwDrdzU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=OqrfCgXhp73uTJQxrGS5x5alxByksVVb8I/K1zaAfeL7IXwOTAKR57YLeweUyh8QM MGaGFB8N6s+cS+gfH3dd+uMusZGhaOb3alFvNn2v1RLw5qjuWpC0E791Pr8ry8uzFu m7JcizrD7lfBYr4fbzTpaJ6aTXld8qTBsXF6rHPs=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([217.251.136.221]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N7zFZ-1i5xR62CeZ-0153Mg; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 22:22:31 +0200
To: Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>, XML Developer List <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <6D7CF9A5-F8FA-4D78-9001-ADC7CD0B2A36@amsl.com> <6AFC0271-060C-4A2F-84EE-CB40DD328039@amsl.com> <eaf9e970-c570-4ee8-096c-ec70e85c4af5@gmx.de> <dabe2baa-9d71-0089-a486-844a3b24a08b@gmx.de> <D7552A58-F10A-4600-962B-151DAB4DA6CB@rfc-editor.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <aa7f25f9-6568-5866-b3ae-bee1503dd59d@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 22:22:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D7552A58-F10A-4600-962B-151DAB4DA6CB@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:MVbtX178wSWZj4jZp8U3soVgLjY7RUm0EJoujWBM8+krOB+poMR EjG0FVgoLQ/S7ZE77PaFeneiSZp/ZkqF/cm2RSVt0XbJPmMm7IpzG3MsL3q1CjsHQnKaiyH kPRk8oVBfG5bJVuwPqxyhzoOCjpsotaPOW9Fmli7RmmOxVF+H8KEJK+TOkR+I1IaW5TWbxP 8xYH+YIsLpiN0ovrILNEA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:pKQAewDiCJ4=:+txiFosIPDZP+zFqhjMDH9 S75zcVowL5T4FfZC0hZrcHNTvAEmEYMYByZvXHMw7IkzDFKwtM/yBjpK1pPyDwjpcP+yuUzl0 qcxum5IEDmt5s4LB5n1BZX7Y6WZYWefCc+3sutPxyqEtSlDh2cL6QFrIL5AzJVL5gghUDBylP nBErxGDJmrf1RycmOC0YAVYBHLLTHk3JPQ9dE0IP3TbJnu/FBYiDAyaN/AqoXPQb4LfN4DwdI I739U01c/dWHuXBVZCa00C1oxK6J8VrD1KdpvsnlpvCVPDF6/DWqQTD/mfDToSh3ZO5TY96Qv 54DcH4TX4KyBXhzrs9nw6R6SC4Z9xKns9L9y+tF+t69BaQ253T8sjeSwEsz50d5wACWeCfXyh xnWqps7EXyQrA66W00Hqrh9G2TfyJ8qfvHUd/Eu3c1nCJEle/I0TDB3jqPjOS2VSRVKyN8k2U SCMmjiSavA5Q7VGFCsZDY5Cf5Wth1Y2cnE26gUD2I580eWw8/Vga4aDNOL59MfVHvuJHmyJ2Q QKx8V4C02Umtr/CVeTrToOcSmzEJ6hM1jziwobaJt/TfvDgqfkweEKt3ZcLF6oLxvg2Kuq2OZ ERBplxUZH0X+FkZBN8vKekVmxnDYpqNFqaWQcWIlD9Y6eVLSli5PYrDWQYrVFqLntNQIY9OlU vlAoULGFFt8wTDgzvZBOj9I6ElVX9/L/9LmiXz9fLGUVmhHkwDjKLnPbFOVOMLKPbvMTelRaX vVUGUPPWeQz2+2r0yaBaTci4pSAsTmWQoYgmpFevWuaK499QMabCU4YO40AHxHR7y2Bnrm0Ch u7sL7JRMCu2ZoGxGgKzcNaC6G8ozxh2FPSRfx9Iqtx3l5JFnsJ38YPFFei/kpMAUcGsb7KTga OZr1oi9Hx/Z68MfG2l9RzQko8umH52z/uPzaPt5ea4dAMpgoEX82Zf+sVNa8TgJGJLiZd2ktw X/l2baFK+H1xRRdl+pTkGzirhmzuWr9ZJ3af/JY1ccqNWK8x8AFvM+eXStxekcfCBC46ZBjVw z/qpbBIkHNoxoRvOobCSGpS9Tv7apNq9ZlfUd6sX8EoweZJOFXWh/C1HhRE0ypkqInn9XCrHb SIl+XSpjbidPfHKlDofuU7XOyMPr6uImjZBgHOy2ry/GnfX94T6opa4vNAxadV58HQNcAi360 CARUj/N4pal721ykCAEfqSCsykPTHe0zyBnci9x4IjPrP/EJO91NBOp3bae8I8VV8EzYBt9Xv nGGAGnJJUkXcQFrnelQF03E9wjttRFucD4D24gXsivlr2l32kx7Un2FQzYNA=
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] RFC 8661 in AUTH48, was: [xml2rfc-dev] [v3] Please help review v3 files
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 18.09.2019 22:09, Heather Flanagan wrote:
> ...
>>
>> FWIW, RFC 8661 (in AUTH48) has that problem.
>>
>> Would be good to resolve it in some way before publication.
>
> HI Julian, et al.,
>
> The RFC Editor discussed this internally; we recognize it as a problem for more than just RFC-to-be 8661. That said, for now we’re going to use a work around, as the implementing of a new way of handling the role of “contributor” is outside the existing scope of work.

Well, the issue has been known for several years now, so declaring it
out-of-scope is a bit weird. Note that this is a regression from v2,
where line breaks could be forced inside regular text, so at least no
abuse of <artwork> was needed.

> The plan for now is touse <artwork> element. Yes, it will look differently than Authors' Addresses in the HTML and PDF outputs. It is not ideal.
>
> The future solution (TBD) may have us creating the role “contributor” and having that signal specific rendering details within the Contributor section.

As discussed in the ticket
(<https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/81>),
adding a new role will not work, as:

- existing tools will treat contributors as authors, which they are not
- it does not address the RFC style guide suggestion to allow mixing
prose with contact information.

> This isn’t a showstopper for going live with v3.
>
> -Heather

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email