IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-flanagan-7322bis-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 19 March 2017 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62248128792 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NzY5KIneBm0J for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A6F1286AB for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9477EB80D61; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F40EB80D61 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19bYnapOQjdO for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31D74B80D60 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id y18so9841497itc.0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+x9tupn+fgs8+OgGiMgajGDJZzp3n6jQBNcYiNNPfEo=; b=mJUq+xgJ7G5NnIVgo51mQFd1O+tbjV206DV/3rj1r1BGwdOG2uwG633pgbXHqBe5/j pBLyMK0cXxwUGATZhQ/V1/Nv52KO/EA3A1YYIXbW9y2p3ISJMj2vDDaORucr/tT7GKHG 035YCKRH63GF0hRJ6bNwtjJGKGdrLmkPLUCIaW77jd4Ic6aiIurybT+BJ+GZD4NgUmj7 7thFLz7XmW3PZSpt5nG/suXIG3oyB7O5oFsVyB+wkueczM/aTGQyCE1nTW3iRVwD4uUd u0w2+/qIPhS1yaV3EJDPv9gvjJWyvHDZLchh9OcVSz8PObYb9/0F5Fld4NdMQB5+Nnp0 OmEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+x9tupn+fgs8+OgGiMgajGDJZzp3n6jQBNcYiNNPfEo=; b=KxX4ssc4zTrLmyKtQOQ/IFLPTyqOXGhbYLyS91upvGXYj/CaFdE3mB2C0XZClCNRrf HjCJGyr/aPzsmNOd08+Bb6dv67PajBFOQ8hd4KQw62iitrSPcGaqod0heR6IJWW7NBlc fMJFEmzqUt8Z31JJwiCZR2yTRQ8M1S19uw9qbjZCQR3eARmR8V1f1I+8qtSBNBtjXk32 ra0DUQ5NGAkMJEqCdrscpzBBZfKPYOI0LDHkZSSMFR0F9Q0BOCfos9lKjBDEfpsppw7L 1Ayx0HIP0hVyjphRiwzwBHldMFjGlIHc76XA6q5CUOMB331hstsI0OdqqXgceV5/Ra9p 1kmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0Yk7xe6bLsOQEoBQCV6logAzZSyrDxuQUomCnhooJkraDs214EZzo1WqdqNeQkNw==
X-Received: by 10.107.171.67 with SMTP id u64mr6909516ioe.102.1489938223556; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.11.95] (50-76-68-137-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.76.68.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i190sm110762itf.11.2017.03.19.08.43.43 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <148916689944.6827.10298084170164994906@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <afd7624f-5643-4dcf-26a9-66742bfe32bb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:43:41 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <148916689944.6827.10298084170164994906@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-flanagan-7322bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> 4.1.1.  Author/Editor
> 
>    The determination of who should be listed as an author or editor on
>    an RFC is made by the stream.

I question whether this completely neutral position is the right one for
the RFC Editor to take. I gave my personal opinions regarding the IETF
Stream a while back:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-whats-an-author

I'm not suggesting we need to say anything like that much in the
style guide, but the above statement seems to completely duck the
ethical questions around authorship.

Regards
   Brian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email