IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Moving my Unknown RFCs to Historic

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Fri, 21 January 2022 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565423A0E8C; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:44:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8sePoacvSWi8; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:44:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931923A0E84; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EEDE973F; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:44:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA2CE973F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:44:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pSMUjqCATeW2 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B77510D71 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id a12so12351207iod.9 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:44:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NVug7WrEGLo5iIxUeVt4HVo+uidYn8OdEzFj+iLVRvg=; b=bt6nnIOxtX9v61W/HDPG0GlqeMtaN/lzp18DO8/qzYky8xcImcn6P+RPittipoPgFc vl9h0/vS9tVPsq1nsuTLDy45YuowdQgQ/thUl8iwdcHoEwXayHZr22v7WwxNZEz7hKWm /a/pmJFo9bUTgmIty2PkCNNaCH/nlY/006TRYpHNBPRdAU/jcLGv9DGdfZn2ee54/M2j /+wanYNeNgo4MCHT24uaTF5wlaRpC35BVZvkk7Uu+SnM+9ZVwThut1TRhVlFDLcGoLMe ZtBZOZFwyDzUDIE7s8sqq01IF87vJHWhg0jjFzjbhaVhbBpSKwz0nrBFgvm2BLzfIN3l iY6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NVug7WrEGLo5iIxUeVt4HVo+uidYn8OdEzFj+iLVRvg=; b=BclPa+IiDCN4kWYDbGRs2UbgXVeu7EgweEa3KAlXJtunaUcAKYe0uqXKqvTDqG2dth /L2RCCM8pMSp42u5QgkezL89KaTcF/LdeBouNJyGHjapO7UZPiB2aooxmxhGhqMU9gSR tT2+YXP9HFOB2dzMboAaJz9Y0VfPHsFO0Tz0YukIQM/+80y+VY2jcXLIVkUE3qrFX+HA NJobr6XPpf5LUOwpcc5O21Wt0PsQMQSAQYzCNAO0eUn2UE4TfpF15mZUtb0Q0qEyY7fx LB+rIapvGeAHv4OC8DHJhTQrWkR/C/LZV0ltwcdcZmi0wpTko61uTDGCtA68fvNjRJc7 XwQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532utQOvCy7RX8kSfRIdQkwfz6TMgff2mh7kC4PYQwIeECRi8tSh OrQIgEjAiZ/3+sewBOC+OjtMO/F31PzIjWsmIY8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkzfzONTWK00qB0WGW+ho4EdGzmLHKyXvT/e/NXs1rECC6cPycCWpgrxIIoDLWPNqUS9ZNVEFfzKC/0ie/3dc=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:620c:: with SMTP id f12mr3184295iog.174.1642801473803; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:44:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAA=duU0FeO+wo3nMWa_car14ncujP7n7xW_onoc2ja6=ok2XfQ@mail.gmail.com> <7c77860d-7c79-37ab-e39f-032ad4f6b70c@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7c77860d-7c79-37ab-e39f-032ad4f6b70c@gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:44:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU02kOZdnyFxDXUjqAVxk4J=60Tn7mu1iyRbxufog4oGNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Moving my Unknown RFCs to Historic
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3641635948982725214=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Brian,

If the current proposal is adopted, then it looks like this would be the
RSCE's responsibility?

Cheers,
Andy


On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:18 PM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> Abdy,
>
> On 22-Jan-22 03:54, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> > All this talk about RFC 911 got me to check my old RFCs. I have six
> pre-IETF ARPANET-related RFCs that are currently Unknown and should be
> Historic, 802, 851, 852, 878, 979, and 1005. What would people suggest the
> best way to get this done? Should we wait until we have a new RFC Editor in
> place?
>
> My suggestion is to wait until we have the new RFC Editor *model* in
> place, at which point the venue for this discussion will become clear.
>
> To avoid being told that I am being obscure:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-10.html
>
>     Brian
>
>

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status