IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] What obsoletes what?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sun, 18 February 2024 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45503C14F5E4 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 18:37:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2viTmWNiBJUt for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 18:37:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F97C14F5E2 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 18:37:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.17.1.24/8.17.1.24) with ESMTP id 41H4ZlJd017574; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 02:37:44 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=+UalBjyS3BvJl9zs+GsITMtc/X4m/HgDJV6vlLKJ36A=; b= oupGkHr/3drPcj67nFUR20C4i8H1KZgt70qfklXQnQsfuYLRvZZjF+cRpRnBCKz0 4lUalFD2P4pD5QctZCvWCb85ZGnzEYhgn9vOg+GfXz3GejatiC649Ptp3vE7AmNn AM57sLnIBorYllC4Y5KIaVElfJrtfSuwPci3AwP+/FaH8UREkpeUoiOEdmNA0p/p I1CAfAiIfh+AlOBBzlJg3lFk0FrnKdMMnP2oFFq1K/irCetdYsXZYILhljtea58w BRYIaxdIZd0oB2HcAqYYItEsOrdtcY+qb2ylV8KTouRmNw/0dNb2W/8dAi5nJgU5 iCBmeMo5zcIc8+DktrVb/Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a72-247-45-31.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.31] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3wamxs9kb0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 18 Feb 2024 02:37:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 41HMFWZX022973; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:37:43 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.204]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3was122qk4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:37:43 -0500
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.28; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 18:37:42 -0800
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.028; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 18:37:42 -0800
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] What obsoletes what?
Thread-Index: AQHaYUh1q5ajjbqah0SS1STuGl8sh7EPlpyA
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 02:37:42 +0000
Message-ID: <03F2CE3F-EBAA-4A34-AA19-72082AB94E39@akamai.com>
References: <9c7191d3-74d4-3d43-8f77-925191d12b5e@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9c7191d3-74d4-3d43-8f77-925191d12b5e@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.81.24012814
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FC5807D6CA86E544AC73F5FC6734F0BA@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-02-17_23,2024-02-16_01,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=451 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2402180017
X-Proofpoint-GUID: Su0aN2NAJzVC1d3Iq_7toNw8vvswFrm-
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Su0aN2NAJzVC1d3Iq_7toNw8vvswFrm-
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-02-17_23,2024-02-16_01,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxlogscore=336 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2401310000 definitions=main-2402180017
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/pL50iP2vmD7WuY_E40K175PE7Ug>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] What obsoletes what?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 02:37:49 -0000

> TL;DR: RFC 6248 obsoleted a BCP (RFC 4148), and RFC1574 and RFC1575 *both* obsoleted a PS (RFC 1139).

When did the "downref" thing become a common practice? RFC 3797? If so, 1574 and 1575 pre-date it and 6248 could be corrected with an IESG action, right?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email