IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] missing line ends in generated TXT (from datatracker)

Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com> Tue, 12 November 2019 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EF41200FA for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 06:38:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJ07zwldlGIM for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 06:38:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2F312006E for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 06:38:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3B9F40712; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 06:38:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A7EF40719 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:23:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8SlpkTEBmop for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:23:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server172-3.web-hosting.com (server172-3.web-hosting.com [68.65.122.111]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01D54F40718 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [146.96.19.240] (port=56556 helo=[10.10.201.20]) by server172.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <dave@dericed.com>) id 1iUH9r-003GNB-IS; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:23:40 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com>
In-Reply-To: <6b05a391-ad8c-285a-b8bd-c5f13fbfa260@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:23:34 -0500
Message-Id: <83EE89DB-B6EB-4495-A5B9-2793BF22F220@dericed.com>
References: <20285.1568652805@localhost> <705AA16B-68B1-4B5E-AE47-0714F6781C1A@dericed.com> <26105.1568818137@localhost> <E70CD0FF-0294-47E5-873F-5E184A248577@dericed.com> <1268.1568828850@localhost> <B4047303-E2B9-4B9D-B368-2ACC85A06D15@dericed.com> <15814.1569013442@localhost> <3a8f5865-9f5c-8c65-63be-bca31c5f1c86@levkowetz.com> <3650B5EF-A442-4291-928A-2FCB2144134C@dericed.com> <06122b6d-d5f9-30b9-2db4-a2427d299a1f@levkowetz.com> <CB32A50B-D6F2-41C4-8AC7-750E35F4941D@dericed.com> <97e68838-ac0c-25e4-67a9-a2a998b6e8af@gmx.de> <3ef6a53c-e18a-9fc7-8324-67f388acd32f@gmx.de> <60a9d29f-03ef-5842-0c21-6930293759da@gmx.de> <cf651c95-9a22-775e-16d9-ebfdc9ee6ed0@gmx.de> <730f143a-f751-e367-22ad-f1fbf53b1c5a@nostrum.com> <6b05a391-ad8c-285a-b8bd-c5f13fbfa260@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server172.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - rfc-editor.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dericed.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server172.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: dave@dericed.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server172.web-hosting.com: dave@dericed.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 06:38:24 -0800
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] missing line ends in generated TXT (from datatracker)
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


> On Nov 7, 2019, at 4:40 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 07.11.2019 21:57, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> ... >> thanks for the update.
>>> 
>>> It's indeed the lack of information that was bugging me mainly. So maybe
>>> we need a ticket system for datatracker?
>> 
>> You meant the v3 format tools perhaps?
>> 
>> (The datatracker's ticket system entry point is at
>> https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/newticket.)
> 
> Ok.
> 
>>> Or is there one that I should
>>> have used?
>> You had already entered this at
>> <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/444>, so I'm not
>> sure what your question is?
>> ...
> 
> Well, the tickets that I raise there mostly get no feedback at all, so
> at this point I'm not sure it's worth using that venue.

FWIW, for the cellar working group, we pipe our rfc xml through sed to find all occurrence of <sourcecode> and replace them with <artwork>. It’s a loss in semantics but seems to workaround this issue for now. We’ll watch the progress of the ticket and remove our workaround when it’s resolved.
Dave Rice
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email