Re: [rfc-i] RFCXMLv3: <referencegroup vs. <annotation
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 08 January 2024 19:44 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D967C14F603 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:44:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.804
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.804 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nfPaN1LwFdLh for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ED98C14F601 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:44:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1704743085; x=1705347885; i=julian.reschke@gmx.de; bh=XXzEnxqHbh2iaC4sOMFUWI44oRpSlYjhbAefQA5x2Jk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=qY8ffiXQoeQ3j7V+97awdH73bbKIgKDYrdk9fGPC3aD85zMhAWQj8cNoRtFpR0Nh D+YVPZ9DKyge27qE0h7LP/Wq+Hg0vcZf0QzZbZgXRZ8MiZlUXruxld2TxgaRvIU3d kbIYD6NZ9P7JUHm66k7t+9cDvFWHkJ49yN8INa6gBwYvEERexUx5Rpgtcx1HGUBBb jLBThyvgsOf5AsweYjBPflaDw8A0RIXHLbnpC5lzFDFKTAhNutHhmxKpp7wbPilAq qw3XoBulwoy6eQ+hkCb6x8qNDP40aIlk4F8Xqq940UxeQOpW2KjN+moqDA2e+z3a0 c8VRctrL4JSDuErYtw==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from [192.168.178.182] ([84.171.144.189]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MiJV6-1qiuEt2gX0-00fSRg for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 20:44:45 +0100
Message-ID: <2d42af3b-f6e8-455b-b585-0d11bfb784d0@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 20:44:45 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <E3704184-4A11-4772-B660-954ECF1C860A@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <E3704184-4A11-4772-B660-954ECF1C860A@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:aSDlANAnMg9Ap0tRwdSIvymnTyN5Cg3NxqrlLxYuCI+kLMz1Y6P 7PXN59h7liIbHWYgw+dOkHYCGx8U+I8qsrRrH3T3pcsOI/fyNyEw1KoSQt7UkJrgsOJda2M 67xx1Nqp5hr5z9e+UhcKa7QGWKDLzsqq3XuqQwWvytJaBVQTnT8pGwlB09NTtOmBrk1WiRc 54QWABMGRjMhMwPz0+XOw==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:1U4DNKiaf7I=;Qj3r49wvE2mppkX0clrh7avpOKp +sI8aDqzcvn9cLCFB5sNG5LB7br5F61hJQX2vFWvzF62GWYhWH22boLe6vSC9HtfQHW/WZtnv ewQ8Zct500dZ17nxjeST1GV4xxLlnqkOrB1OP/yCQV8vSnqtbmkKOlpw+hpit2OEA0IFQGt69 2Z2ENZ5V92Fcwp7aTj1dCq4rnqqXO+st/UXelOZHVnyQPwqr5xrAAMdHMJotIClOQ+rsLzkTk wBEUsBS40OuBvXU7156Ygfp7S+AYcxyY/rgqEIFn89q3wkIylKFD0vWdzlXanRKT+LkiD9wBf JujmH4UYdEZjYahTI4o6BqV3veJfMZYY3UYRWKuqfVEVAwMpQgk0wBATUFdvSUUnZWwmeCkc6 QhkOJrd3Wy/nSJGngyvda6i5M9cPYxC3jho07ocGSrUFiPam2NV6bF7hPuEsZOWW8CCnnplS3 FkdSSQQswCIwvuB87K2v3K1tP21RUFAmv4RnLvumhHSM6VPcnIga0uRwQkILTzsDCnSQB6Byj 0Y/xVlNVuYvqFDLDiRyv9LMcep4C8cgu/V1NIhewVt2SZ4WopgR8q+0hPmmNzPQBMz2DYCvTx 3nlNMQ72Zc/lzSj5Kru3Cc9xiIkjSUsNs8B/Vy3Y6tQBGDeCv7cp2sDTR3CE4x/CVO1UYFx1f 64nN/dcpvPIcKEWyYK9n7fjtIpVQWhoeoDfz80HtjiEQItHsHp1moqTGcMy/+p1qdL7wI2Rj6 Ah6FfIGCN4Iix9RU1uicqNSVB9gYsm7KJCk353Vo5YQ7soMiWvSPBcXyGd3A1d//vGd20VHI1 kBK9I0cY193Sd8F4cx3Ago/6vB9QJ0wm5VMP1S7xkzWJgaSiEGTUDK911RWTSkJRiPZCFADi2 C57vCyFzwKPLpG2O5q2tApqXa7dsUPeL31G6dTCqy2N0KJi1flN/cgBgDQ0EUzeLBj77NwBG/ JAs2+BjW9i4gu74OlcdWmih0ORU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/s2Y7AB9GxPZwIaQLZk_5_KyAFu0>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] RFCXMLv3: <referencegroup vs. <annotation
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 19:44:52 -0000
On 08.01.2024 18:22, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Does anybody know why <referencegroup does not allow <annotation elements? > > Grüße, Carsten Probably because of the assumption: this is just a snapshot, and we will revise it soon. Seven years ago. Best regards, Julian
- [rfc-i] RFCXMLv3: <referencegroup vs. <annotation Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] RFCXMLv3: <referencegroup vs. <annota… Julian Reschke