Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag comments

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Wed, 25 March 2020 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEB23A0DFF for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLsrLMNyEbg3 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 826033A0770 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62274F406F7; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F7BF406F7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: DNS error: query timed out)" header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aAn8pqDMXvhb for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9830F406D6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9yqekiHyFh8XypPFM26JBS2tSuzVo+fcLcJrK7TNJ/o=; b=3hg9YUm2+f34C+Yg7Ep2havexl za2eDpGplVIfBJg+3iVdH6dxnvGX7UlQ8bBgmV4GRcH1PQbUCEV1cfp0vSvBA7i2fSi90gZpDLzyy nFB2kGoyl4Y/QVL3s6t+uS7iAvk+a7LDt9Afehk3BPvr1fMFiQznxjfxALEEmNG5Qm8FjyPXtZaVy 1pxgNss5PUDtTYoqgbfV5ZhAN5zRmgyKvC6Hwxv+vxQBfJ1n7DMHI1LZ/q9nAwXtANzdyw0dG3qgf Kfm1Ns3Frzg7GSp9TWVUyZgfufSVCyMCiXWu9JwX0QLlLrJhS/TNIJYAI/xRggnxsaBfShWmwhAVk rz6njZ/g==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:63049 helo=[192.168.1.5]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1jHEzY-000gj9-Lw; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:59:24 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200325222325.GP30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:59:20 -0700
Message-Id: <7A25F3DA-8FD3-404F-A5D7-0E7430850A73@strayalpha.com>
References: <20200325222325.GP30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E255)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - rfc-editor.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag comments
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


> On Mar 25, 2020, at 3:24 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> I "feel" that it would be better not to try to solve our issues
> nly with as few as possible tags, but also ponder what a good
> amendment/extensions text in an RFC should look like.

IMO the latter is better guidance. We need less process, not more. ESP given we have no compliance requirements. Tags are not a solution. 

Joe
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest