Re: [Rfc-markdown] 1.6.1: v: 3
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 21 February 2022 17:04 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9669B3A087D for <rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:04:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vy6wFv0Z44zg for <rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986AC3A0869 for <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4K2TD31VxFzDCd6; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:04:03 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_63126F90-0307-47C1-B8AA-F33CF94FA8BA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <26734.1645462351@localhost>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:04:02 +0100
Cc: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 667155842.515497-6fadecf3d5f6311e4a0c8d619c376bb0
Message-Id: <FCCFA49E-F9A2-49B7-BA8C-9E9673FC95B4@tzi.org>
References: <F8D413BB-6B10-488D-B0D6-E4A21F4382B0@tzi.org> <26734.1645462351@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/Q2edQCm0Oa6shs87LveVC436o2g>
Subject: Re: [Rfc-markdown] 1.6.1: v: 3
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:04:11 -0000
On 2022-02-21, at 17:52, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > > Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: >> Changing a default creates a flag day. As I hinted at before, the flag >> day is 2022-02-22 at 22:02:22 UTC. > > Good choice. 2022-02-22T22:02:22 — the day v2 died (Maybe not as catchy as I had thought.) >> When you use kdrfc as the driver, -2 also switches the xml2rfc called >> (which defaulted to --v3 since 2020-09-04) to --v2 (--legacy) mode >> instead. > > So do I still have to upgrade the v2 to v3 using xml2rfc if I'm not using > kdrfc as the driver? I guess maybe that's a reason to switch to kdrfc. kdrfc can give you a converted v3 XML alongside its other products (mongrel XML, TXT, HTML, PDF) with the -c flag. And: Yes, you should switch to using it. Grüße, Carsten
- [Rfc-markdown] 1.6.1: v: 3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Rfc-markdown] 1.6.1: v: 3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Rfc-markdown] 1.6.1: v: 3 Michael Richardson