Re: [Rfc-markdown] Submissions rejected because of postal glitch

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 03 November 2020 12:33 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FC03A03C9 for <rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:33:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2cGqvSTmpqD for <rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDFD73A0317 for <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:33:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1604406806; bh=JFk+LlMu4AwWpBi3ODKUISdYYIslvX1uen2s2Uo9rVg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=AQc18Ea++0ZwUDEXwPC9okMTIXzuiRUtgOWgnrl8t7FGJ5iceVECEwbYEW876VLXG gMMiFpIrUzuHGwfxrnS23A4SF5+zFJiDDd4J7cd6k1X37PW71x8KzB2rzhmHJ1A6oS VvhAMz5UO7WN1STx1S5z7mMqktH6g53zZUp/j8rw=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.236] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MuDXz-1kLPUR0LYz-00uXZj for <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:33:26 +0100
To: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
References: <F3031B1B-4098-4388-8EB7-7C3C7DD078A0@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <0b25e916-bca6-856b-85fa-32b479b7fca5@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 13:33:24 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F3031B1B-4098-4388-8EB7-7C3C7DD078A0@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:E4aYdgLPkNnaagwAY0ua54cxTZbgXvFrQRp1HAniaksv+93ZIgf At8ETSdrUFmrIupDB7BOtmkLA4ypZGWDRUO92uqnVyonRoJagQ9lvea/LpmVz0MPxmDKsL3 XeD+SuA52nn7FR0GAl4coPIgO01sZyNlPrccI7f5MRGlp7T48ua96MP8PQrRY8t64fGmRAH hCiDSt6DtvWaEgs9gtKCg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:w3gKkDNChsw=:i+EyN9tXxxJorGGwfNOZSu zKGqWspovxtR4an9phc8k+TzZ4/0oU0WW3C7NJ3t4Ww1LCwhUWPgzPajky64bKxDGCQwwfQPg LgnfsvkPRD3RC/QqhYcsZA15x9ikBi7pIhZT0ymzu1SBuRdZV24LOk9FrgzU2a5hSW2Xgp5Gm ECu1oho6EEs3PjXX6EXQtU64uvJLYgNv9IbT6kx5PdlPrDMt8p5oePYcKE2Ae1BhPJdWQ8SYA R7rDypH+LJt/xTU/msez8vHV/ovs/c+HksMdFG2YrosldPQHhhDZdhyaftjDMc9A4s6ENCJun twXzH9L61tKxDejurvvzMSVW/mkGtx+StJMakpAcTGYFi6hfYOhcqJwBef6CwXBxoOQjab4jW +sz1eHfwPrVjE0AzAiufS2MowLMOr+ICK2MNWNzzbk/CRa4DyCTVMDQaBbK1njJd7vlyt2C6A UrJ2UV8YS6pJuvvqE3JRaA/3LQPgLAE2nuESxc3XviEb/qtX/K1eZhVyCMZlm+A3bEl75i/+R aE6N2xX1uilVBiv2iCwqp2RUW+UPKSC1Q9F5ZTjiStcuZFs2PkiLRkkPLY/pdxdoBinAw7Ozz FouHyvh0Kb8jW6M+obuIdrm4FyL/68a8MPChxTVvExuO4qVaLE/IPcBQlFHns8bZOM1CowZfk KRIpdOHLGJGBJ8rhe7bJb1NsY51tkP+UVn7RA8vE7Xa9T2tzAXRV+dLQkzAlzGSWmyRTtyxYU imitW9ya4jdvOxh77PCefAAFJG0pLjTDj7LAGGA0xS2QpuaSg6luX/qBZx6+A24NzKiL4e9rk grngjmF9B8WE0r88Q8CkBindDa7D2fs9/+J8KjW1t7j75iRn2FzTFU5MmaDpIUFHg6bEwDJBu StrAJsjrkewmT8IGXyzA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/UTcyBHOONNVdZiiB8JNZgHkbkKA>
Subject: Re: [Rfc-markdown] Submissions rejected because of postal glitch
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 12:33:31 -0000

Am 03.11.2020 um 08:57 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
> No, it’s not about USPS being destroyed deliberately, this time:
>
> Error: Unable to validate the XML document: INPUT
> INPUT: Line 44: Element postal content does not follow the DTD, expecting (street+ , (city | region | code | country)*), got (city code country )
>
> Locally, xml2rfc has no problem processing this document, but the submission failed anyway.
> Apparently, the validator employed in the submission tool insists on there being a street (and that not being empty!?) in a postal element.
>
> Has anybody else ran into this inconsistency?

<street> is indeed mandatory in v2; the workaround is to submit an empty
element (see
<https://github.com/reschke/xml2rfc/commit/7e9d2b7fe1333608400e6a2bf7c9a5cf144a7c36>).

In v3 documents, this should not be necessary.

Best regards, Julian