IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Fri, 11 March 2022 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0FD3A08CE; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 08:48:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BtbkrJKr3aF5; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 08:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4CE73A08C7; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 08:48:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:420:c0c0:1011::9] ([IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1011:0:0:0:9]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 22BGmDfA783410 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:48:14 +0100
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1647017294; bh=4zHdZBqreOJ3S6TcDBYSL3p7+k+H1M6IQxmWACBhqYw=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=PNH9Jbt7k5tBbqbq/yc3KARt2OSVRrloubmRPgFqAIKrNgA9ORcLSj7hMuOm7aBq8 a+XkPPoGSHEn1H9Nq0Gx0WL1KuIAXSRCtqukjg7XJELgdL95ekF3L1He5sKwKlpw4w w2fOeCYBNhT1bd7FrVxWN06ZjxXFZAj2z+bPocmw=
Message-ID: <02879e76-d96a-3bc0-034a-7e538a77a2b0@lear.ch>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:48:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, rfced-future@iab.org, IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <CAL0qLwbHobErxtCxiMCtYtqByJJhWF79XAwtw2jV9DNte1OuUQ@mail.gmail.com> <e3e01de3-8b69-852a-7dca-cb0e9735ce4a@lear.ch> <CAL0qLwZnaZ2J=7YnOS96h42135w6NrEdn-Obj7QOWwwRxDj1vg@mail.gmail.com> <c059e4d2-99a1-3148-16d4-c789673575df@lear.ch> <CAL0qLwZkaebQmmQdfKsW7oCd58X5DRWY6_QpUaVUueZAyGVA6g@mail.gmail.com> <797efdc3-e674-504e-80e0-fa2b48923bb1@stpeter.im> <CAL0qLwauRS-G+_OcKPx-bRB0EpDKyib+XysWLTBRBka1CqQkmg@mail.gmail.com> <caaea09f-92cc-beae-2a4f-5df4cbf6ad7f@stpeter.im> <9BAA878C-8CE0-4083-A0C2-FF9662B1D267@tzi.org> <32125d36-816d-ec82-9feb-3ff95d819e6c@stpeter.im>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <32125d36-816d-ec82-9feb-3ff95d819e6c@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------IKjkajGm0G0D7o2dS2hPViUq"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/X_7YK1LwzCuLPNAMhZjluaCi5O8>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 16:48:26 -0000

On 11.03.22 17:39, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> The RSAB MUST be able to stop train-wrecks before they happen.
>
> As far as I can see, they can do that - even though they were supposed 
> to participate during RSWG discussions, they might notice something 
> during their RSAB review that they missed earlier on, community 
> comments could introduce a new issue, etc.

Yes, they can stop train wrecks, but may not be able to stop some fender 
benders.  That's the balance the group struck.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email