Re: [Rfced-future] Last Call Reviews of documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model

[Eliot Lear <[e-mail]>]

AHHH.... Ok.  My bad.  Quite a number of documents flying around on this 
one.

Eliot

On 14.02.22 21:19, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> Hi Eliott,
>
> My comment was made on 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rsalz-2028bis-05.
>
> The title of this document is ''Entities Involved in the IETF 
> Standards Process'.The Abstract of this document says:
>
> >    This document describes the individuals and organizations involved in
>
>    the IETF standards process, as described in IETF BCP 9.  It includes
>    brief descriptions of the entities involved, and the role they play
>    in the standards process.
>
>
> This kind of contradicts your statement:
>
>
> > This document does not address IETF process, but rather the 
> evolution of the process that oversees the RFC series and RFC editor.
>
> So I believe that my comment stands.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 7:19 PM Eliot Lear <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>     Hi Dan,
>
>     Thanks for your review.  YANG and directorate reviews are part of
>     IETF process.  This document does not address IETF process, but
>     rather the evolution of the process that oversees the RFC series
>     and RFC editor.
>
>     As such, IMHO discussing YANG reviews or directorate reviews is
>     out of scope.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Eliot
>
>
>     On 14.02.22 16:35, Dan Romascanu wrote:
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     I reviewed on behalf of the YANG Doctors team the four documents
>>     submitted for comments associated with the change in the RFC
>>     Editor model. My reading and review concerns only aspects related
>>     to documents related to YANG, containing or refering to YANG
>>     models and the review process of these documents.
>>
>>     Here are my findings and comments:
>>
>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05
>>
>>     Ready
>>
>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rsalz-2028bis-05
>>
>>     Ready with Issues
>>
>>     The document is ready from the perspective of the YANG Doctors,
>>     with one comment. The document does not mention in any place the
>>     role of the IETF Directorates and review teams such as the YANG
>>     Doctors in the IETF documents review process. As the reviews of
>>     these teams are part of the process I suggest considering adding
>>     text, possibly in Section 3.
>>
>>     ttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01
>>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01>
>>
>>     Ready
>>
>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
>>
>>     Ready
>>
>>     Thanks and Regards,
>>
>>     Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>