Re: [Rfced-future] What would an "RFC Series Consultant" actually do?

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 10 July 2020 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09A63A0FCF for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8xaag524T1un for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A8B83A0F13 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=384; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1594397780; x=1595607380; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=aH4WAk4xvFHsmFb9DQL0GHbOEd0pWylzdFM8mdfdzgE=; b=TEX5HvmHYuTRIpBHBWzBrDX1/xe/hKeMNAXADoGUjbXJb+KYTLvByedT 703Bwfx1VrLu59blyjYR4zc1UD3a/UxWpAVHnuaV8hr1F8Ns6Nkc7xr9J 3/+11EzD9sCwMvFOgTNPBbI3g4w2cIXMdno+M4BxWhNzHqKcRIW6LDtra Y=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0AmBgBxkwhf/xbLJq1gHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQIFKAoF5gXIBIBKNYIgWnAgLAQEBDAEBLwQBAYRNAoIXJTkFDQIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVnhXABBAE6PwULCw44VwaDOYJdIKlPdIE0hVGFC4E4jQuCAIE4HIJNPoQ9g0mCLQSRf5JAkFiCZ4MGlk8DHYJhAY5BjgOtAYNSAgQGBQIVgWsigVczGggbFWUBgj89EhkNj0MBCI0bPwNnAgYIAQEDCZAUAQE
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,336,1589241600"; d="scan'208";a="25372004"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 10 Jul 2020 16:16:16 +0000
Received: from [10.61.219.10] ([10.61.219.10]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06AGGFOn028803 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:16:16 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNRG1KqfBDFt27Rsh3w3kG5EgEr+bUfssun0OdQRrrvng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:16:15 +0200
Cc: Nevil Brownlee <nevil.brownlee@gmail.com>, rfced-future@iab.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5CBE097E-0D70-43C9-8D2A-192615E1E842@cisco.com>
References: <CACOFP=h_eK-nxXqp73X4-YPYKq26cPOZEPH_urGnTDndrM-S3g@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNRG1KqfBDFt27Rsh3w3kG5EgEr+bUfssun0OdQRrrvng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.219.10, [10.61.219.10]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/mJ87vvRUZemc-hfbHdB66qjIpC0>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] What would an "RFC Series Consultant" actually do?
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:16:26 -0000

Good afternoon Eric.

Only on this point:

> My impression is we have rough consensus to break out the project management pieces. That would be good to understand.


Indeed we have a related question to gauge consensus.  I think we might want to be more specific around this point tho.  The chairs will have a quick exchange on this.

Have a good weekend,

Eliot