Re: [Rfced-future] 2nd Last Call: draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-10 ends 30 Jan 2021

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Sun, 16 January 2022 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992BE3A174E for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:51:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAD26AAJAX6G for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5453A174D for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:50:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.227] (77-58-144-232.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.58.144.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 20GHop4L072537 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 16 Jan 2022 18:50:51 +0100
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1642355451; bh=ciYtaek8O2QsfM3EoBmF9se6oKrinNQjRODUbDLy3JE=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=K4puaFlGdIegnXwOkDLhqCQO58s6VnOAAlKvgooHW1SW1JCNk8AxfTuhhuMmvXAyo meDSmbelCw/VqvsgBQSCdvMs2f4+p3Q364oqzcDPp92feW8vR+EyA7S8vzvvprNZpk 7pDV7JpNkzC31Hyg9lmO6FSUHY67NSByBNJ5Bz1k=
Message-ID: <0bd4b021-9c99-5907-1dce-4992399d07dc@lear.ch>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 18:50:51 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "rfced-future@iab.org" <rfced-future@iab.org>
Cc: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
References: <bb77c97f-4a28-a366-a46c-b567488639af@lear.ch> <39e43f1d-e360-ae5f-1783-2995cb428ce0@stpeter.im>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <39e43f1d-e360-ae5f-1783-2995cb428ce0@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------eL24etsRVPlSVKnYJsXenH3U"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/yO2oV8QIDQqGDJZlPie3ljAVwws>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] 2nd Last Call: draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-10 ends 30 Jan 2021
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 17:51:03 -0000

Doh!  Yes.

On 16.01.22 18:41, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> For avoidance of doubt, that's surely 30 January 2022, not 2021. :-)
>
> On 1/15/22 11:06 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> Colleagues:
>>
>> This begins the program last call on 
>> draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-10.  The comment period will end on 30 
>> Jan 2021.  Because this is the second call, we are asking that people 
>> ask themselves whether a concern rises to the level of a real 
>> showstopper before commenting.
>>
>> If the last call requires further changes, we will work through them 
>> and ask Peter to publish a new draft. We will then forward the 
>> program draft to the IAB for further processing.
>>
>> Brian & Eliot
>>
>>
>