IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] draft-klensin-rfcplusplus-alternatives-00

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sun, 15 July 2018 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CEF130E74 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uYkKOrUZcWIP for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 10:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296511294D0 for <Rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 10:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADAE660187; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 20:27:35 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9frujBhd4zz; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 20:27:34 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1714C66012A; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 20:27:33 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <3999518B904EE0C559977E18@PSB>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 13:27:32 -0400
Cc: Rfcplusplus@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <4677A31C-2466-4E9B-A891-33130150F4DA@piuha.net>
References: <1986638168567223C132B119@PSB> <CAA=duU3fQgq+6Qhus=zoD8i-5TjfLZpCLfawSm=jjdiv_7FY=A@mail.gmail.com> <3999518B904EE0C559977E18@PSB>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/9en4ATkL9Hbo6ESA6vpNMSGHoaI>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] draft-klensin-rfcplusplus-alternatives-00
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 17:27:40 -0000

> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-klensin-rfcplusplus-alternatives-00


Thanks for writing this, John, I found it a good enumeration of options.

Also, I found this process reasonable:

> (1) Determining that there is actually a problem 
> (2) Sorting through possible solutions 
> (3) Actually designing any experiments 


Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email