IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rift] Fw: comments on draft-przygienda-rift-dragonfly-00

zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn Fri, 27 October 2023 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39577C14CE22 for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qjz2nZ7FFkNd for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD724C14CE4B for <rift@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 02:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4SGynZ1WYXz4xPYh; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:59:46 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app06.zte.com.cn ([10.55.23.119]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 39R9xc96014792; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:59:38 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:59:40 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:59:40 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af9653b8a0c115-66280
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202310271759409443913@zte.com.cn>
References: 202310271740269533158@zte.com.cn
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
To: prz@juniper.net
Cc: rift@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 39R9xc96014792
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 653B8A12.000/4SGynZ1WYXz4xPYh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/JBaVge7nYFiz4iUF10hrkJsf_cI>
Subject: [Rift] Fw: comments on draft-przygienda-rift-dragonfly-00
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:00:13 -0000

Hi Tony, 
Sorry just found that the figures can be seen from pdf file, please ignore the figure request.
Best regards, 
Sandy



 




Original
 




From:张征00007940


To:prz<prz@juniper.net>;


Cc:rift<rift@ietf.org>;


Date:2023-10-27 17:40:27


Subject:[Rift] comments on draft-przygienda-rift-dragonfly-00



 


Hi Tony, 
Thank you for providing this draft! 
IMO it's an interesting topic that using RIFT in dragonfly or dragonfly+ topology. 
Could you please post the draft figures here for reading the draft easily?
And will you consider using east-west connection between the TOFs? 
Though it will change the flooding and computation procedure in RIFT protocol, we think it may be another feasible way. 
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Sandy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email