[Rift] RIFT minutes for IETF101
"Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net> Thu, 26 April 2018 01:22 UTC
Return-Path: <zzhang@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055AE12D94C for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mcBaaEj-Chaj for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A86A4128961 for <rift@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108163.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3Q1InRl030080 for <rift@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:22:17 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=mZhM0g+N/+1UJCwBfRDPg+PVAyjW8BrAM7tbOLWIwYg=; b=ITezX6vt5ICg65aYO3sGdg9b0e/nl4C6R5SANistLcsFWlAxZ5QPre2oKeiR5OuKKCpD 6r6eo8TLukPuWP6LZdcU4t4tGGaFaSQzqlGFXAcoBnxPLxPMluMvorm8Qa8+amBPXbPT wARatCqtiIVKItKNkzS1KdeS+kuhHybKJqFtJ5US3wrrka7CMqbjoWZLslS3qjf+K5oI Bo4CH/yYSZt/Qspr2rpCqm9XdMdjcNVB3KJBq423OXisjzx+co333cPUvxv4oapieZz/ 1iQ16EkYhJomLNKgRG/P7YOu4kB44BSfdXPdOZf5hWZZ5oPZ0zIusIjFy8XzVlqNdAL/ oA==
Received: from nam02-sn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam02lp0018.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.180.18]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hk4qy00vf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <rift@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:22:17 -0700
Received: from BN3PR05MB2642.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.166.72.18) by BN3PR05MB2690.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.166.75.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.735.5; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:22:16 +0000
Received: from BN3PR05MB2642.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8ae:ea5c:6d4d:bfe6]) by BN3PR05MB2642.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8ae:ea5c:6d4d:bfe6%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0715.007; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:22:16 +0000
From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
To: "rift@ietf.org" <rift@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RIFT minutes for IETF101
Thread-Index: AdPc/IqBEAcPfSE4SCOkJedTTEb5MA==
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:22:15 +0000
Message-ID: <BN3PR05MB26428F24E43D00F3C92D7A3CD48E0@BN3PR05MB2642.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR05MB2690; 7:ufH9blLTMbJC9/We9tVlOvDiEVWhFA6R19caeFNQC0/9eSibglGHSqewpyYF6Tqt0naW68T3xSmnj/wIlvnBljCZNO3rImSE6QriLxj44cPtBmMK+IisiK9rOXlJ7smP4r2d+jIGHV5Fs+IGSGzxZUF6N12c5QMsxOa1aCsEJ/ITWkwj/rTZgSNbyo5f6KJ72emZgvqsbpDTfe5TfmjBDYGPWsuXdBpAR0SLizWhc2iHwXgTt75pwWGW6LeGvuGZ
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2690;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR05MB2690:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR05MB26908F7D3E8152309D089583D48E0@BN3PR05MB2690.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(3231232)(944501410)(52105095)(6055026)(6041310)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201703011903075)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2690; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR05MB2690;
x-forefront-prvs: 0654257CF5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7966004)(376002)(396003)(346002)(39380400002)(366004)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(3280700002)(53936002)(2501003)(8936002)(81156014)(81166006)(6436002)(8676002)(2900100001)(59450400001)(5250100002)(6506007)(1730700003)(97736004)(5640700003)(106356001)(105586002)(476003)(486006)(7736002)(7696005)(55016002)(6306002)(33656002)(9686003)(66066001)(99286004)(102836004)(25786009)(6916009)(74316002)(68736007)(2351001)(966005)(86362001)(316002)(508600001)(3846002)(6116002)(5660300001)(14454004)(3660700001)(186003)(26005)(2906002)(305945005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR05MB2690; H:BN3PR05MB2642.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: R8U6aYQNqqkrSp4PIiNRreV8zu+pXr0kirMDYnD17npnp+62ulWWRvf6rAjGMHlK8J4derNFiP4ppQIo1KJ/b3EZWRK8LkNdjVDQUH1WLlMwiZY3O3HLWwfH7JMbysYRYdt49nYJ/UEIJCyj2bchNONI8bSyFed7pwSwXsjmy1Pbb7X9bT1qNcvcv+eq7EfB
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 541d2c38-5860-46e2-c28a-08d5ab142588
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 541d2c38-5860-46e2-c28a-08d5ab142588
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Apr 2018 01:22:15.9638 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR05MB2690
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-04-25_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1804260012
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/ee_qQYoDONOvTtYVIg5qHrb3yJI>
Subject: [Rift] RIFT minutes for IETF101
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:22:21 -0000
Sorry for the late posting. Just realized it had not been done. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-rift-00 Thanks for Olufemi Komolafe to take the notes! Jeffrey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF 101 RIFT Meeting Notes + WG Status Update and charter discussion (Jeff Tantsura) + Motivation, Additional Requirements and Use Cases in User Access Networks (Yan Filyurin) Tony Przygienda: While network slicing merits discussion it is pointless to attempt to redo RFC 2547 VPNs. Yan Filyurin: Agree. Not proposing to do so. Tony Przygienda: How does default routing break tunnelling? Yan Filyurin: Building the tunnel is easy, knowing how to forward into the tunnel is the challenge. Aggregation means it can be difficult to know exactly what traffic should be forwarded into the tunnel. Tony Przygienda: But tunnel destination endpoint more specific than default? Agree to continue discussion offline. Tony Przygienda: Is there really a problem handling mobile workloads? Currently, a TIE will be flooded from each of the old and new locations. This should suffice. Yan Filyurin: What about the workload moving to a new branch of the tree? Tony Przygienda: Existing mechanisms handle this fine. Agree to continue discussion offline. + draft-przygienda-rift (Tony Przygienda) Tony Przygienda: Who has read the draft? Who has read draft more than once? ??????: Perhaps should be asking who has *understood* the draft? Tony Przygienda: Will present survey of RIFT, laying out landscape and emphasising areas needing attention and further work. + draft-zhang-rift-yang (Sandy Zhang) No questions or discussion. + draft-zzhang-bier-rift (Sandy Zhang) Jeffrey Zhang: This work is not currently in charter and so the point is to show how RIFT can easy work with other technologies, such as BIER. +Wrap up (Jeff Tantsura) Jeff Tantsura: Thanks for attending. Goal of today's session was to give some background and introduction to RIFT. Next meeting will focus more on the appeal and potential of RIFT.
- [Rift] RIFT minutes for IETF101 Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang