[Rift] Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-rift-kv-tie-structure-and-processing-07: (with COMMENT)

[Mike Bishop via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rift-kv-tie-structure-and-processing-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rift-kv-tie-structure-and-processing/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for addressing my previous DISCUSS and COMMENT points.

I'll retain this non-blocking comment:

In Section 2.1 and 2.2, there's no need for the 2119 language (MUST/OPTIONAL)
for describing "support of" the Sub-Identifier. Rather, by definition, when Key
Type is Well-Known or Experimental, the Key Identifier field has this
additional structure. In Section 2.4, the situation is similar. Rather than
"The Key Identifier MUST...", you can simply state that the semantics of the
Value field (including any vendor-administered sub-typing) are defined by the
vendor whose OUI is in the Key Identifier field.