Re: [Rift] [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-rift-rift-20
Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net> Wed, 27 March 2024 19:43 UTC
Return-Path: <prz@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E70C14F5FC; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b="bM9thqyu"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b="Db8CUgTG"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sLzo2E09rITU; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A247C14F5E9; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108160.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.17.1.24/8.17.1.24) with ESMTP id 42RFrsWM003605; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:43:17 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to :content-type:mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=Oze3zB2Nc71OoLcDixVNgX NUc3aqyzz+C/V8Nhh2v8A=; b=bM9thqyujsQxqI/FR7szd2CJRSb8Nx8Y7OHuoI GhGORLmtKgyJSZHHp0YvkXIlxff3Mpm40kAgMZffG5UAtPjs0Vfa2SfLmhGgCI5j rQQGOCpYhLndwz9NYyAZE4LUbWlOVWjTPV1JyjmNp43MKKnz1Csb3m38yqMDMZT+ 2Xj/BPy8odCAUh7n1QDiohevgLjaL6++SbpKyFFdwNHT/qBYWrrW+7I6FbHwhN6m 2Wyp5n2t3R7f2I5d096SjCYLljsxokKQR/ishmM1ypukqWI+CNw37lUXNdmghgyV vlbZoPK++CtUimwVF/SO5LHl37xEBDnWni7OusRmew6pE5iw==
Received: from bn8pr05cu002.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eastus2azlp17013022.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.93.12.22]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x1w0d3bkx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=KSJAKsyYM0Kbca6WiTd5DdxPm9tbEY5eCXyYQKALZx2OclOunNHGj4+IzG0rXc7LE/5Z1cnYFQCzKPweZBAy9v2jHuiIwb5elkG527NmQhT2vcDHtKLvnWMab5mys8flZx6Q6z9vjjIz1ZLroD7K/uIXYpQFH9RA1dyFYts2iAteZ6P2TEh1szK3KRQKuT1reyw7wWBDPBEmziowCNiSVvhZIpvQnPbjhlzNiOjU1rah4McttY7LQsrnoAyh8GS6CbcELsukhvfd87ZUB+EB2yyqaIOaMtbRs7lfUohzPbOmOY4EV4riks9DXCpldArhwLvt29D+6LuZx1BoEkOZzQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=Oze3zB2Nc71OoLcDixVNgXNUc3aqyzz+C/V8Nhh2v8A=; b=npKKPy2C3sXnAHdPuledBC4Y4jzOrx9A2sAE4SnRi1YfTKpINGbf8QG9vRbbIa6Qi4VulRSr94ry8e3G1hmBaNzbdSFbQLWgRipQXNIHoasI9x10dReHa4F6YcUOT93Qz4xokK4HmqbtlC/30M44kxIK/51CEzDpv2/gcWIRaOYg6vlB6YuAjQq06kG4cMMaUg12HeYoM14wouMxNQEmUWHAyXkQrO6rqUdBmVX4r8FM9umGwfVXkCuCmQ6ewlHHopi0EE6EkLABVOEZ+Q1xu24zfSSNHSjKMJRu6hV/9UvNCCAWXL7nAZD529TK5y4XVa4w47rj2ENvzjD6q1BrZg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Oze3zB2Nc71OoLcDixVNgXNUc3aqyzz+C/V8Nhh2v8A=; b=Db8CUgTGaszcF26bSGJg59L2E5QEl3h1k9K1y4j3OPrUmlcZ4obQYlnhct9bNnAJ1IKnW3H+cGnriWNNdeVjvtLwMLJaQow3e52ryhfr5IFw796QiOizNoSAKLCOH+pmWFTLMXYFrt3xELFM/Z6blNkMIdk9cZTq+1BfzxSkG14=
Received: from CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:340::19) by PH0PR05MB8528.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:be::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7409.32; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 19:43:14 +0000
Received: from CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d2df:81b3:5c62:6a8]) by CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d2df:81b3:5c62:6a8%6]) with mapi id 15.20.7409.031; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 19:43:14 +0000
From: Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net>
To: "loa@pi.nu" <loa@pi.nu>
CC: Jordan Head <jhead=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rift-rift.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rift-rift.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "rift@ietf.org" <rift@ietf.org>, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-rift-rift-20
Thread-Index: AQHaed85QuXopThtmUKcBoAR0QiLM7FGU/M2gAW2UIA=
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 19:43:14 +0000
Message-ID: <A69B6A41-0944-4247-B8A1-44EF7E41027B@juniper.net>
References: <171084025066.20222.12149424859698001324@ietfa.amsl.com> <BL0PR05MB5362039AC93B47D17403370BB62C2@BL0PR05MB5362.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <a1d3d245bdea4a66f7e4d28f37f9898b.squirrel@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <a1d3d245bdea4a66f7e4d28f37f9898b.squirrel@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.4)
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CO6PR05MB7796:EE_|PH0PR05MB8528:EE_
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230031)(1800799015)(376005)(366007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A69B6A4109444247B8A144EF7E41027Bjunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3105d193-9451-4ba7-2e34-08dc4e96247d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Mar 2024 19:43:14.3987 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: y+CXGM3UCshmmMHpBL715ZTg8LHKA1XPhNRUno33hYATRTa4Oqn8ze+0XJJe9YYC
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR05MB8528
X-Proofpoint-GUID: G43svwwXjOw47R5l-gm5tMPaaFTsL2Hp
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: G43svwwXjOw47R5l-gm5tMPaaFTsL2Hp
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-03-27_16,2024-03-27_01,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2403210001 definitions=main-2403270139
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/nMrmoijBv2MBvnOCjxTnkf-Q7rs>
Subject: Re: [Rift] [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-rift-rift-20
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 19:43:24 -0000
Loa, thanks for comments, all good, last we are on abstract Now, as to abstract, up to 13 version we had a far bigger abstract “ This document defines a specialized, dynamic routing protocol for Clos and fat-tree network topologies optimized towards minimization of configuration and operational complexity. The protocol o deals with no configuration, fully automated construction of fat- tree topologies based on detection of links, o minimizes the amount of routing state held at each level, o automatically prunes and load balances topology flooding exchanges over a sufficient subset of links, o supports automatic disaggregation of prefixes on link and node failures to prevent black-holing and suboptimal routing, o allows loop-free non-ECMP forwarding, o automatically re-balances traffic towards the spines based on bandwidth available and finally o provides mechanisms to synchronize a limited key-value data-store that can be used after protocol convergence to e.g. bootstrap higher levels of functionality on nodes. “ This was roughly modelled on RFC2328 in list form ;-) That was nuked based on reviewer comments (don’t remember who) as “way too long, way too much description” So, what do you suggest so we don’t go in circles. Re-incliude that? Rewrite that? Any idea on wording? — Tony On 24 Mar 2024, at 05:29, loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu> wrote: [External Email. Be cautious of content] Jordan, I'm mostly happy with your replies. One thing is my comment on the Abstract, I think it is valid. I'm not asking for more details, rather is more overview. The abstract is intended to be stand alone, it shall be possible to cut it out and pasted in a relevant context (e.g. a test on "What are the RIFT RFCs all about" and still be understood stand alone. When I started to write my first Abstracts Scott Bradner told me, think of your own manager and write a text so he can understand what the draft is about. That is what I'm looking for, not more details. /Loa Hi Loa, Thank you very much for the review. My comments are inline as jhead>> Jordan Juniper Business Use Only From: Loa Andersson via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org<mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 at 5:24 AM To: rtg-dir@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org> <rtg-dir@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>> Cc: draft-ietf-rift-rift.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rift-rift.all@ietf.org> <draft-ietf-rift-rift.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rift-rift.all@ietf.org>>, last-call@ietf.org<mailto:last-call@ietf.org> <last-call@ietf.org<mailto:last-call@ietf.org>>, rift@ietf.org<mailto:rift@ietf.org> <rift@ietf.org<mailto:rift@ietf.org>> Subject: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-rift-rift-20 [External Email. Be cautious of content] Reviewer: Loa Andersson Review result: Has Nits Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!BRuyr5rrXI7fzEEwSLkBFPHxwxMpAQ2JqcFYDfAidh4TTICD4Pz1ksoGTHCoSzGMntg0TwEwstFA9w$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!BRuyr5rrXI7fzEEwSLkBFPHxwxMpAQ2JqcFYDfAidh4TTICD4Pz1ksoGTHCoSzGMntg0TwEwstFA9w$><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!BRuyr5rrXI7fzEEwSLkBFPHxwxMpAQ2JqcFYDfAidh4TTICD4Pz1ksoGTHCoSzGMntg0TwEwstFA9w$%3Chttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!BRuyr5rrXI7fzEEwSLkBFPHxwxMpAQ2JqcFYDfAidh4TTICD4Pz1ksoGTHCoSzGMntg0TwEwstFA9w$%3E> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-rift-rift-20 (the current version is -20) Reviewer: Loa Andersson Review Date: 2024-03-19 IETF LC End Date: Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: This document is basically ready for publication (with nits) ; though I found it a bit hard to read. - at least for me the appendixes contain info that was useful when it came to understand the document. This could be mentioned early in the document. Admittedly the Readers Digest does a good work, but it is quite a bit into the document. Document Overview: This document defines a routing protocol for Clos and fat tree network topologies optimized towards control plane state efficiency and a minimum of configuration and operational complexity. Note: One have to get far into the document (even into appindixes) before you understand the specification of that protocol Comments: The draft is long (189 pages), and it takes time to get through all the details. That said the authors does a good job, it is more that the topic is new and fairly complicated. Especially the "Readers Disgest" section is useful and I had to return to it serval times, jhead>> Ah yes, I think this comes with the territory (as you said, it is a new protocol). I'm glad to hear that the Reader's Digest section was useful. Major Issues: None Minor Issues Abstract The abstract of a bit thin, I can't really get what it is asll about from just reading the abstract, and that it what is there for, right? jhead>> We originally listed the various optimizations made by RIFT in the abstract, but it was quite a long list, and well, not very abstract. In working with other reviewers (AD, etc.) it was decided that a more concise approach was better for the reader. Nits: There is a long list of nits found by the nits-tool (not running verbose), please fix those! jhead>> The majority of these are a byproduct of using the --expand flag when running xml2rfc before submission (this is required for our document due to the use of SVGs). I have already started combing through and addressing the other ones, however. In the abstract you say "clos and fat tree topologies", in the the Terminology section you say "This document uses the terms Clos and Fat Tree interchangeably". Should the abstract asy "clos or fat tree topologies"? Caveat: This is a grammar comment and I do not normally make grammar comments :)! jhead>> I agree, good catch. You mixed "terms" and "abbreviations", have concidered two lists? jhead>> They are all ultimately terms that are used in the document, some just happen to be abbreviations until we expand them on first-use. I don't think having two separate lists would make the document easier to read. In section 5.3.1 you use "acronym", I think the preferred word is "abbreviation". All acronyms are abbreviations, but not all abbreviations are acronyms. jhead>> I presume you mean 5.2.1 (as we don't have a 5.3.1) where we say "This section describes the terminology and acronyms...". I'll change acronyms to abbreviations as it is more accurate. One question on the policy defintion in the IANA registries, can you have a reference to an Appendix in the IANA registry? jhead>> I don't know the answer to your specific question, however IANA has had several discussions with Tony so that the spec meets their needs. I have not found any other nits. /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu> Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com<mailto:loa.pi.nu@gmail.com> Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 -- last-call mailing list last-call@ietf.org<mailto:last-call@ietf.org> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!CUKQcwvj6gulB67XPsxOXSWO5ELAXnv5EyFbZp853U0a6lFypiUSl93VfbPSRYltgm4gWQM$
- [Rift] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-rift… Loa Andersson via Datatracker
- Re: [Rift] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Jordan Head
- Re: [Rift] [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of… loa
- Re: [Rift] [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of… Antoni Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of… loa
- Re: [Rift] [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of… Antoni Przygienda
- Re: [Rift] [RTG-DIR] [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call… loa
- Re: [Rift] [RTG-DIR] [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call… Jordan Head