[rmcat] review of draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-04

[Steffen Schulze <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

while reviewing draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-04 I found a
minor typo you might want to fix on page 7:

then an ECN-CE mark MUST be reported that for packet;

to

then an ECN-CE mark MUST be reported for that packet;

In addition I have some questions:

If a duplicate packet arrives which would update the ECN-CE field for
the previously reported packet, as stated on page 7, how far back the
receiver must report that?

Can a CCFB packet include multiple reports for the same SSRC? (Which
would be interesting for updating a duplicate.)

The current proposal includes information about packet reception back
to the sender for all kinds of QoS parameters, including jitter,
packet-loss, round-trip time, etc. Therefore would it be worth
considering to report duplicate packets to the sender as well?

Thanks and regards,
Steffen