Re: [rmcat] WG last call on draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model-06

[Colin Perkins <[e-mail]>]

There were no objections raised during the WG last call period, so the chairs will request the IESG consider this draft for publication as an informational RFC.

Colin




> On 25 Nov 2018, at 23:25, Colin Perkins <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> RMCAT working group,
> 
> As noted below, and as discussed at IETF 103, it is believed that the video traffic model draft is complete, and that the changes in the -06 version have addressed the comments.
> 
> This message is to announce a short WG last call to confirm this. If there are no objections raised on the list by 30 November 2018, we will send draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model-04 to the IESG for publication as an informational RFC.
> 
> Colin (as co-chair)
> 
> 
> 
>> On 16 Oct 2018, at 20:55, Colin Perkins <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> RMCAT working group,
>> 
>> The draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model-04 draft has been in WG last call for some months now, and we solicited additional reviews at IETF 102. 
>> 
>> We received comments from Michael Ramalho on 13 August, Jake Holland on 11 September, (Jeromy) Fu Jiantao on 12 July, and I sent comments on 15 July. Apologies if I missed any other comments.
>> 
>> The comments are primarily editorial, although there was a comment to improve the security considerations. 
>> 
>> This message concludes the WG last call. The authors should submit a revised draft to address the comments. The chairs will then run a (brief) additional WG last call to check all the comments were addressed, before submitting the draft to the IESG.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Colin Perkins
> https://csperkins.org/
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/