[rmcat] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model-06: (with COMMENT)

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-video-traffic-model/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

§3: I am a little surprised not to see much discussion of how much variation in
behavior you expect from different real-world encoders. I think the models
probably have enough knobs to handle this, but an overview discussion would be
helpful.

§6: From reading further, I understand the real-world encoder creates a library
of frames to be sent during testing. If that is correct, it would be helpful to
say a few words about it in the opening paragraphs.

§10: It's not obvious to me how the listed consideration is security related. I
am willing to believe it is, but some words to tie it to security would be
helpful.