Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-dt-rmcat-feedback-message-04.txt
Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 06:51 UTC
Return-Path: <jonathan@vidyo.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F06412008A for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:51:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vidyo-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9oAbqehaAlgp for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ADDB1292C5 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id n89so11204826pfk.11 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:51:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vidyo-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=mGrmor/YopIy6TwKxmHszqB9AEMpyvZFQ59p/ifPpgA=; b=1ckVBg69xmJQUBKMd4DTbRsowamgZyoMLSoNVoxMzH182L0S2CeZyRQ0uOAJU4XeR6 Mqkf/uYlD9r3PFKyUBGoSioEpbl1rzqORj6Q9Kb2IsktPTYfSx+utK9wm8i0OVio/c5X 5pN8KCH77bvtdu6jaxMwKMIxOLxo7c5rV67p6+3xa/dDVdoOcpAfVdt8xVGv9fJRuZ/Q uV/qyVIa5tk094pxO5VCXST//ZpaawippBWdiWMXopDpYT9CMzDP5I9d7SqtBYyqfklC 7THsuiFatX38bg+7Mnl/D3So+VJ9O25oGJE67ZFsla+WmQU4C9FRcxp/Uw9XpObzXIrh hmJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=mGrmor/YopIy6TwKxmHszqB9AEMpyvZFQ59p/ifPpgA=; b=lftridUtV97+Ynu5DTtVjhq3KQnZNC+BE/dzRdxQXH4Z6HeSpGJhv/Pe3oV0iYW2Mq Wtg6EeeTPymqwhe7jHCP9upd6SjcO0e1q9OcJwjz3LLW63MOClgsFPzZ5FKfqC3Di+G9 guKZQuRVdmkKtfCJTKNtTiNa22E58yHB0jo+36bss/LzNkoNWVM9g+DNpL0OoMaBYHbn 7E64RnaaOI4hx2C9IJv3AY3ngkHk4fxf42x9K2fBMQysk3TxmjOPyUEXLkBlf5FGOX6a UHYeW9abk/bYd4ZtsfeF33TLH/lPuJHh6zkT1O3j+Y24n+N+tGf5PR3H2e/QxcSDRkaL cs/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4smnIs8D50Bp0f3t8ozoCZaXKYd0JzfCAfeVBxz/k1utAeuvdP YXYgvbEloG+0j6iRR9ovER8jYQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZcMFaC+rvQeknYvmKmIzPfGhe3VC7OjLVhekFSBUfFCd0hrwwunxQT57OqwCvrpvd5Sia8JA==
X-Received: by 10.99.127.91 with SMTP id p27mr6896082pgn.1.1510555890234; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:ed0d:3546:761f:c4d5? ([2001:67c:1232:144:ed0d:3546:761f:c4d5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 84sm30444166pfy.179.2017.11.12.22.51.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:51:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
Message-Id: <EAA2D7B2-4E8B-42C4-AB67-68CB3A4CBD31@vidyo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_344783BB-C939-4402-9C4B-F71B651CC567"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:51:26 +0800
In-Reply-To: <AFAA1D34-0584-44B8-BF94-43BC38E5F835@csperkins.org>
Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>, "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>, "Michael Ramalho (mramalho)" <mramalho@cisco.com>, "varun.singh@iki.fi" <varun.singh@iki.fi>, IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
References: <150913051158.22299.4504001911028448869@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB4PR07MB3482E692582ACB45A21A3BDC2590@DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AFAA1D34-0584-44B8-BF94-43BC38E5F835@csperkins.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/nHD94HavFmU19uYp5n_d29NAPrk>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-dt-rmcat-feedback-message-04.txt
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 06:51:33 -0000
Since this draft is now draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message, it’d be better to move this discussion to avt@ietf.org <mailto:avt@ietf.org>. Thanks! Jonathan (AVTCore chair) > On Nov 13, 2017, at 12:33 PM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote: > > >> On 30 Oct 2017, at 15:35, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Read through the draft and I believe that I understand how it should be implemented and when time permits I will replace the home-brewn RTCP feedback that is currently used with SCReAM with the version that is specified in the dt draft. >> >> There are a few questions though. >> 1) Arrival time offset (ATO) and Report timestamp (RTS): The time granularity of the ATO is 1ms while the time granularity of the RTS seems to be 0.1ms or can even be configurable?. Is there any reason to have a differing time granularity for ATO and RTS? > > We need to define these more carefully, but I agree that ideally they have the same units. The obvious unit for Report Timestamp would be the middle 32 bits out of 64 in the NTP timestamp, as used in the LSR field of SR packets. That doesn’t map so nicely to the 13 bit ATO field though, unless we make it count 1/1024 of a second ticks rather than 1/1000. > >> 2) Byte order for ATO and RTS is not specified. I guess it should be network byte order for both RTS and ATO, right ?. > > Right. > > Colin > > > > -- > Colin Perkins > https://csperkins.org/
- [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-dt-rmcat-feedback-messa… internet-drafts
- Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-dt-rmcat-feedback-m… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-dt-rmcat-feedback-m… Colin Perkins
- Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-dt-rmcat-feedback-m… Jonathan Lennox