[rmcat] Test Cases for Evaluation
Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de> Mon, 31 March 2014 13:36 UTC
Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3CE1A0867 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.26
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.26 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n2u_ArkTISIp for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailsrv.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (mailsrv.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.170.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20231A0860 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netsrv1.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (netsrv1-c [10.11.12.12]) by mailsrv.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A84E6027D; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from vpn-2-cl195 (vpn-2-cl195 [10.41.21.195]) by netsrv1.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B1F6027C; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: rmcat@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:36:34 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20101217.1207316)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201403311536.34255.mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/yn0ez5pJEOu4koEmbB9ysuH8l1Q
Cc: "Karen E. Egede Nielsen" <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Subject: [rmcat] Test Cases for Evaluation
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:36:41 -0000
Hi group, we would like to know who has read the document(s) that are specifying evaluation test cases, especially draft-sarker-rmcat-eval-test-00, and if those people think the content of the document(s) is interesting for the working group and that the group should continue to work on this (which means potentially adding a milestone)? Thanks, Mirja
- [rmcat] Test Cases for Evaluation Mirja Kühlewind