IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rohc] WG last-call for SigComp User Guide and Torture Tests

Cristian CONSTANTIN <constantin@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Thu, 18 August 2005 18:37 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E5pGT-0002tm-7U; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:37:21 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E5pGS-0002tf-AL for rohc@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:37:20 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA22615 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:37:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de ([193.174.154.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5pqD-0001gX-RD for rohc@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:14:20 -0400
Received: from tipau.fokus.fraunhofer.de (tipau [10.147.65.84]) by mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j7IIbEZ24036; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:37:14 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from tipau.fokus.fraunhofer.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tipau.fokus.fraunhofer.de (8.12.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id j7IIb9sF001618; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:37:09 +0200
Received: (from cco@localhost) by tipau.fokus.fraunhofer.de (8.12.7/8.12.1/Debian -1) id j7IIb96O001617; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:37:09 +0200
From: Cristian CONSTANTIN <constantin@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:37:09 +0200
To: "Surtees, Abigail" <abigail.surtees@roke.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [rohc] WG last-call for SigComp User Guide and Torture Tests
Message-ID: <20050818183608.GA1602@terix.fokus.gmd.de>
References: <A632AD91CF90F24A87C42F6B96ADE5C50F9655@rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A632AD91CF90F24A87C42F6B96ADE5C50F9655@rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
Cc: rohc@ietf.org, "Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)" <lars-erik.jonsson@ericsson.com>
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1495579540=="
Sender: rohc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rohc-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:41:46PM +0100, Surtees, Abigail wrote:
> Hi Cristian,
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out.  It is, in fact, meant to be there.
> Between state_start and state_end is a seemingly random stream of bytes.
> They are in fact the bytes generated when translating the mnemonic code
> that is commented out (and which are subsequently run).  I thought it
> would be useful to show where the bytes come from but obviously didn't
> do it very clearly ;-)
> 
> I can add a comment along the lines of
> "; The bytes between state_start and state_end come from the 
>  ; translation of the following mnemonic code".
> 
> What do you think?

cristian: o.k. I got it. I guess it should be mentioned that the
commented out code is the disassembled version of the state code.

bye now!
cristian
-- 
 _          | There are many people who use UNIX or Linux  
(_'_        | who IMHO do not understand UNIX.
  (_'rist   |              --David Korn  
GPG public key at wwwkeys.de.pgp.net

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status