IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rohc] Empty CSRC list issue in IR packet.

Ghyslain Pelletier <Ghyslain.Pelletier@ericsson.com> Fri, 29 August 2003 11:55 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA15051 for <rohc-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:55:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19sgJQ-0006fH-5N for rohc-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:17:00 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h7TAGww2025600 for rohc-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:16:58 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19sfUL-0003Bj-MX for rohc-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 05:24:13 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA02310 for <rohc-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 05:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19sfUI-0005vj-00 for rohc-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 05:24:10 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19sfUH-0005vf-00 for rohc-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 05:24:09 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19sfPJ-0002zN-V1; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 05:19:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19s2Pj-0007wT-Kd for rohc@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:40:52 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10192 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:40:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19s2Pi-0001IC-00 for rohc@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:40:50 -0400
Received: from penguin-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.47]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19s2Ph-0001I9-00 for rohc@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:40:49 -0400
Received: from esealnt612.al.sw.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.118]) by penguin-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.12.9/8.12.9/WIREfire-1.7) with ESMTP id h7RFel31010528; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:40:47 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from lms001.lu.erisoft.se ([150.132.144.19]) by esealnt612.al.sw.ericsson.se with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2655.55) id QXY5YM8F; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:40:46 +0200
Received: by lms001.lu.erisoft.se id RAA10309; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:40:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <3F4CD175.9A035A92@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:42:45 +0200
X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
From: Ghyslain Pelletier <Ghyslain.Pelletier@ericsson.com>
Organization: Ericsson Erisoft AB, Ericsson Research Corporate Unit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Remi Pelland <remi.pelland@octasic.com>
CC: "'rohc@ietf.org'" <rohc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rohc] Empty CSRC list issue in IR packet.
References: <F54085DA4E90D511B80B00B0D0D007D26BA7A0@EXCHSVR>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: rohc-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rohc-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Absolutely - sorry about that. Only the text from "It should be noted
..." up to "... present if CC > 0"." should be removed in 4.3.3. I was a
bit to fast taking the entire stuff out. Thanks.

/Ghyslain

Remi Pelland wrote:
> 
> Hi Ghyslain,
> 
> Your understanding is correct.
> 
> As for removing section 4.3.3, I think it would be usefull to leave the
> portion that proposes a behavior when the CC field in the dynamic part of
> the RTP context and the CC field in the CSRC list do not match.
> 
> Thanks,
> Remi.
>

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email