[Roll] call for adoption of dao-projection draft
peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Mon, 21 November 2016 11:26 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F90B1295FE for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:26:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTJ8AGbQ4VZn for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 910291299D6 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.217]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id AbRx1u00W4h15BW01bRxbd; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:25:57 +0100
Received: from 2001:983:a264:1:8d0a:fa89:62f4:4b5e by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:25:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:25:57 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Roll <roll@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Message-ID: <c0985e7e40220d98906818db3674a8cd@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (oh0IOkOh6KFU/gKbzkB/qWV/IFAjstHp)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/-w4luea_381ecMpGH-0LQ8OxaIA>
Subject: [Roll] call for adoption of dao-projection draft
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:26:01 -0000
Dear all, (This is the call for adoption for the *dao-projection* document.) During the Wednesday meeting of the WG, we've discussed three drafts, which address items we have in our charter. We've had three raise-of-hands in the room, with support for the adoption of the documents. You can find the minutes at the following address: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-97-roll/ We are now moving the call for adoption to the mailing list and will be closing the call in two weeks (on December 6th, 2016). This is the call for adoption for " Root initiated routing state in RPL" draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection-03 Please read the draft and reply to the list with your comments, remarks, suggestions and votes on the adoption of this document. Many thanks for your reaction, Ines and Peter
- [Roll] call for adoption of dao-projection draft peter van der Stok
- Re: [Roll] call for adoption of dao-projection dr… peter van der Stok
- Re: [Roll] call for adoption of dao-projection dr… Lilian Maina
- Re: [Roll] call for adoption of dao-projection dr… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] call for adoption of dao-projection dr… Alexander Pelov
- Re: [Roll] call for adoption of dao-projection dr… Satish Anamalamudi
- Re: [Roll] call for adoption of dao-projection dr… peter van der Stok
- [Roll] some comments / questions on dao-projection Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] some comments / questions on dao-proje… peter van der Stok