IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] comments for draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations?

Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu> Fri, 13 September 2013 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D424111E8144 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1mhY62Fmxov for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [129.7.240.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAC211E814C for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BD223CAA3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:15:24 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.uh.edu
Received: from dijkstra.cs.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dijkstra.cs.uh.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y+H2+tNGhroC for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:15:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from it.cs.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.240.6]) by dijkstra.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866A023CA99 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:15:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (mail-la0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) by it.cs.uh.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3312A2809D for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:47:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ev20so626487lab.39 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=st07OMoW4g6AQOTKPDi/bX7qVE81H+egk2W5rcJqmAg=; b=XijZ9KSCnKVfOmR53ZrRs5rBloIn7eMtDZI30ZWhMmSYqc+n/PaHLyBM2rDHqFk+g2 SKujCTDQzZTqYrxvxYusmfn7rdaRX+QxYk7EACF2a6CszvmahNPYAmP+iUVaYlnihklV GDac997lmKQVHuqP9o8gWwZyoedZYlGabJeeAuTDajZZNqu+/hIo6BGzPHEGnO0YUCjp bSzMt3JV98yh32ZsI91i0NRBowEDctpPJNevpaSaaKRND2P/SmHD267hiwjMW8VYvAYh JjdbkOnURWWY1EtaryGBm19tZGak5M/KL5m7FOuwdOg/inJcyYhPUEiodUfOCKQ6nyIT J8ng==
X-Received: by 10.152.26.72 with SMTP id j8mr9520104lag.19.1379052916615; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.236.3 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:14:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CAErDfUQy7dOH1qjpBLHSDm2Lchy9cXLKcJqGXTo6==N74tgQaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [Roll] comments for draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:15:44 -0000

Dear ROLL WG,

I plan to update the draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations in the
next day or two. I would love to hear about any new/old/usual/unusual
experiences about RPL use so that I can collect those insights in this
draft to benefit everyone in the community.

Here is the URL to the current draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-03

Thank you.

- om_p

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email