[Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6550 (3287)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 18 July 2012 09:12 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A620A21F8650 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.217
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.217 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hhc5dWImxSB8 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096F021F8643 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E9B21621A1; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
To: wintert@acm.org, pthubert@cisco.com, abr@sdesigns.dk, jhui@archrock.com, kelsey@ember.com, pal@cs.stanford.edu, kpister@dustnetworks.com, rstruik.ext@gmail.com, jpv@cisco.com, roger.alexander@cooperindustries.com, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, jpv@cisco.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120718091225.E9B21621A1@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:12:25 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:13:02 -0700
Cc: roll@ietf.org, nduong@purdue.edu, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6550 (3287)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:12:10 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6550, "RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6550&eid=3287 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Duong Nguyen <nduong@purdue.edu> Section: 6.5.1 Original Text ------------- 127-255: Rejection; the node sending the DAO-ACK is unwilling to act as a parent. Corrected Text -------------- 128-255: Rejection; the node sending the DAO-ACK is unwilling to act as a parent. Notes ----- The status code range of "Rejection" overlaps with status code range of "Not an outright rejection". Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6550 (draft-ietf-roll-rpl-19) -------------------------------------- Title : RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks Publication Date : March 2012 Author(s) : T. Winter, Ed., P. Thubert, Ed., A. Brandt, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, JP. Vasseur, R. Alexander Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6550 (3287) RFC Errata System