Re: [Roll] Default setting for config flags after MOP 7.

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D323A0D22 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XX9SdPt8tgzY for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3278C3A0D23 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id di22so9533837edb.12 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ChF7aEqsZIXY2H8/bFzcieJVA7UgY0rIRA9x3hYr25A=; b=afZHYO8uLanJO5AKvB5CWydQRnKEHv8q/FZExObfQy+8YQ5azK3EjtMLIfH8DoKO4f +CVVGbeA+F/kW/uQqMw7vW/TLWU74nS95wdaHOvRG0iYZOd4SLSG9yK8EXm4+ZKmIq9M cpYehAHoDMicqsmQ56x0Iw8dP++elssX6ZgQ0rc/ix4oz96turHmo7XYsathx8zrQYJx OQPpJdUGk+/NQxlX/JosotC8LVZx0g7tvwS8TnKQZxJuuKvZ1hWjfCNw4wwO5mwckGHK mVfcyTWKxVPQ+BnXkWzbX5wRiyHCVQJU42Vf/lsAN4TbpgkH7ILXvyVtRa2AaTzsKqEl 7khQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ChF7aEqsZIXY2H8/bFzcieJVA7UgY0rIRA9x3hYr25A=; b=IVBaq38Q24si7k94+YIWB4MFQf97KGw2//EKYALZFhf+m/wmi96xD9botM1uq8694W mcrJqFHB/UPpsxxbf1N/8GtwjC184H05I2QEJn91LMAmCVlEeJm22UH7u8BrZ9Cvu2Hv eMo7JvowBS2OJZJ24fRr++CxBB+QTPiSn4FKxPagcuWT9VhLsgEbAF1rhJ/0gGK65vPe j9xEp7yB+yJZwuKh7k6o8zl1nnlgr6cHrL6RpJkKeQjquTgJJX7FP5wk3wmdA8oQtV0m nzvUD0KrOXjyfbB+FuNYimk23N3qoU3cbuKTLEfnfbV7lvyW/Y2z+gnonk2NTsrLIdba N0dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FUSv1htFYdcrNQl3P3CAu97/jLc+nGXzMLmpdon1smXM9grfW /rjAb1UCYASV7dfEDpv4RGHycHzfMfdQZGf86E7AmzlL
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFTbzBTCfYzYWLkQuc295TJyV5eLEUTf68kC2lUg1Z0Lea0z+JpKFNXdPoQMmAYdYESanl1X5B0TnB2wJqOgA=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd15:: with SMTP id i21mr16335891edv.153.1596009534540; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB35653DADFCA0DC40412E5B29D8780@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35653DADFCA0DC40412E5B29D8780@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:28:43 +0530
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp3dJZGf+wkNgA-55prnL9VM0mFzm3pHQKRUXenOvtD2Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d517f05ab8fed26"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/1j1L71E9RpThwkhqK9PrjRoim9E>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Default setting for config flags after MOP 7.
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:58:58 -0000

Sorry for the late reply. But for the record, I agree that 6lorh be turned
on by default for RFC6550-update and also 0x23 be the only option type used
for RPI (obsoleting 0x63).
Should we also start a thread listing all the mandates that RFC6550-update
might do?

Regards,
Rahul

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 15:34, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Dear all:
>
> During Alvaro's review, another point was raised for which we need a group
> consensus.
>
> We said repeatedly that the turnon flag is defined only for MOPs < 7. This
> is also true for the "RPI 0x23 enable" flag defined in useofrplinfo.
>
> So we are asking implementation to check that the MOP is less than 7
> before they use the flag and only use it in that case.
>
> But then, when it finds a MOP that is >= 7, what should the code that we
> write today do? For one thing RFC 6550 makes it a leaf.
> But what about the RFC 8138 compression and the RPI 0x23?
>
> For both bits, the assumption would be that the probation phase has ended
> and that implementations have migrated.
> This means that after MOP 7 the default is that RFC 8138 is turned on, and
> that Option Type in the RPL option is 0x23.
>
> Do we agree?
>
> Pascal
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>