Re: [Roll] Adopting turnon 8138

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Tue, 05 November 2019 07:31 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D12812004E for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:31:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=apbEBRMZ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=SajINlG0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YGjbIj9t1Kyd for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:31:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18FA3120013 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:31:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9257; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1572939067; x=1574148667; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=j8e89d4NhH8zm5cglmb3ww0hvMOKnO5TCy3gGY2yQO8=; b=apbEBRMZHU3KXNN6r+aeGmPx7yP07R2B9uAm7NCyptoxPCllZQymHOu3 3L+TPraD1tLefsRGM/qABRCtXUDI6PPc3M1/3tNw3vD1wqczwL5NQNmAl DiJjXY+QD63EKA5DzlB1hqMdaDfzzsiAa8X8bGY/t6oJycc037LRnvKYq c=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AG0vlxBfkZc/1UIluOzO8zemylGMj4e+mNxMJ6p?= =?us-ascii?q?chl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwGQD57D5adCjOzb++D7VGoM7IzJkUhKcYcEFn?= =?us-ascii?q?pnwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/dzA6Ac5PTkNN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DSAACfJMFd/4gNJK1mHAEBAQEBBwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BEQEEBAEBgWkHAQELAYFKJCwFbFggBAsqCoQfg0YDhFqGIU6BayWJVolGhGK?= =?us-ascii?q?BLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBARgBCgoCAQGEQAIXg3ckNAkOAgMLAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2?= =?us-ascii?q?FNwyFUQEBAQEDAQEQER0BASwMDwIBCBEDAQIoAwICAh8GCxQJCAIEExsHgwA?= =?us-ascii?q?BgXlNAy4BAgELpBgCgTiIYHWBMoJ+AQEFgTgCgQ+CSg0LghcDBoE2AYwSGIF?= =?us-ascii?q?AP4E4DBOBTkk1PoIbRwEBA4EmHDwNgmMygiyNCBKCZoU7JJdYQQqCJIcShzy?= =?us-ascii?q?CWoQQG5lnlnGCEY8ZAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFSOYFYcBU7KgGCQVARFIMGg3OFFIU?= =?us-ascii?q?/dIEojDcBgQ0BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,270,1569283200"; d="scan'208,217";a="645706135"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 05 Nov 2019 07:31:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xA57V4Lk011885 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:31:04 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 01:31:04 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 02:31:03 -0500
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 01:31:03 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ldPEcmebIBuoP90woVamCYMf0YJbx/D08R1zhTENy0al/i41rEq/Vz6kDxLEe6+5EzmQhG3FnDGEnQpY8/8G3cO2TspJOQS59mFp5O2AdaQONnv318sGRbKnt3zMQw4P0ql9prKo+zrGM4HtK4R5IQAlRqTZDeQRvl9j7wrTImsc7c5PdUZpU5sH5Gt/1LzwHe9Fay8zjUElSOkXBX33BidBH7LIevpONw9IhKZhxRb3mBtlKfh/g107j9hqqE2fbXBPK5BtNU0mJlCG2x1BbJ+MH0NSe89Ltw7njxpxTicokdgR824ENR1ikkAP1hE/cNiDNeQJm7yccUwcAd1wcw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=j8e89d4NhH8zm5cglmb3ww0hvMOKnO5TCy3gGY2yQO8=; b=hmTpLd1gD0gbmfcGzGVYRThFDXxyr/OofkTMfGRzuV8GwDlx6eWZrYBxW2wzdyoA9zO9cdNQhD2S2A1v+lnnBq6xxjwTnYXBSGZpLNAD85/uNsnpMVxulpjKJoyUTbWHnLYxsKfEvb2QUp0p3a6V4H/J/9/gqlLn7murMs+H9jU4SuEVToi2/7RcfAuJBEXfs4pzH4DGaSzi6FnHiudVpzN/3soUpdQ1K6MCBubAWpzkdm+OQDsbZrsZcYGoHvwbbQFw+1l3JZC9VXa0OlVhUYwWH2xIHYB8HUBR1D/NAG2WRQ4Z8FJGEGDEWee21sjhCdRlnlU30upnBfXD4s5jJw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=j8e89d4NhH8zm5cglmb3ww0hvMOKnO5TCy3gGY2yQO8=; b=SajINlG0jsViaWiPYbAQwDCwmO64esJJfoBAGC2rFxDU8FlB7fcIzpCHq4EFVvHhfKuK7W/T3ekCY/UE/rq1N17L5D4r77/zu5WJS077H8nbD4n9xNq80R/XcPf4G1xWSYSEQrNUz5pkQTp/r2Mitkxueh3kGBbb4LWAbcSbQwE=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.250.159) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2408.24; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:31:02 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::31c9:3a31:3c07:a920]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::31c9:3a31:3c07:a920%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2408.024; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:31:02 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: ROLL WG <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] Adopting turnon 8138
Thread-Index: AQHVkz51IaUeQ4e3TG2QSA0m4ffOf6d8L3Y6
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:31:01 +0000
Message-ID: <76EB15DE-5CCD-4088-AE87-FF68436BC267@cisco.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB3565D8323B4C7860396B2F8DD8610@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CADnDZ8-p+HiLw9eoq8zKnRh9PqiT4HGYXdg_Cqid=eGQmd=V5g@mail.gmail.com>, <CAP+sJUebKNAAEixtJQ-BFTDt3Aq9X2=MvgYJw_NrCrbtd1P3=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUebKNAAEixtJQ-BFTDt3Aq9X2=MvgYJw_NrCrbtd1P3=g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [91.69.164.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4c95d92c-2beb-4aad-5fbe-08d761c21c40
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4366:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB43663E0E3878D3FFC3A00448D87E0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 0212BDE3BE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(4636009)(136003)(366004)(376002)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(22974007)(189003)(199004)(66476007)(446003)(2616005)(316002)(11346002)(229853002)(5660300002)(102836004)(26005)(7736002)(8676002)(81166006)(33656002)(81156014)(966005)(53546011)(76176011)(6506007)(2906002)(186003)(606006)(486006)(561944003)(14454004)(8936002)(476003)(6486002)(36756003)(91956017)(478600001)(71190400001)(25786009)(3846002)(6116002)(54896002)(86362001)(6512007)(66066001)(6306002)(6436002)(236005)(6246003)(99286004)(66556008)(76116006)(256004)(6916009)(71200400001)(66446008)(64756008)(66946007)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4366; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: UL+WUud74MnzKGxqdyUMOronrxo9W3fmeau7Xcg85j+Y8Fc5wJANwnx0viBDUHJHJr7CIx+tjA4ztdjSHo9+CLE78Jt2u5XyUu01FA5wbAXvvufqSUCp6kO2Pb6fnTui3LWWr0aZuRfsiwG5st32m252TeD/jiTiAlrhXJcCSjwgt66to9KlHDg77RXcJa0DxJB2vosImtmhsN6YsfpaRVZSFDMhKDxoSwOakGEwFb4H/mRTMFVqLSFTsNecGpNN7MY+RcViP51b/NQ+QisdKV85aYVUsl+jirjNgVNWfiIKWiIqwzaoMzopCr0F8xVRqCInQDt8mpOjQzxFEfmMqFxZ+yJ9ts1SAq+Xxa4g8sIvyMm2cPJwVGUmDi4I/kpSRfpP4rXlx1AVMp4YVniswetMlfHq9IKdeHkhv84BQ0mpYFNObdDe6wrDju/PDCmDWQI+ZzzttfzRyqYTXhuMmESkGgDNFDdD9KEgwXG0X9A=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76EB15DE5CCD4088AE87FF68436BC267ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4c95d92c-2beb-4aad-5fbe-08d761c21c40
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Nov 2019 07:31:01.9896 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: teRWIiGbP5+E8R13YuNdBppykw5SDImTT95VI5TtZycJ5P+wu4Vn3bj3ov2tsdG5875IB2J+HnHZGJ3sipPfCQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4366
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/2Lbc1rK9vMWtZdHRYFfS0ngBswA>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adopting turnon 8138
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:31:09 -0000

DODAG configuration as it’s name indicates is configuration. The goal is to tell dynamically how the protocol is operated as opposed to configuring all nodes separately.

RPL operates in control plane and data plane. It does proactive route setup and reactive invalidation. These are all trade offs that are chosen to optimize energy and bandwidth efficiency vs. some theoretical perfection.

The current proposal does not generate any additional transmission. Defining a new protocol to set one bit might appear more perfect but would require bandwidth and code footprint that we do not have.

You are very free to propose an alternate solution with enough details so we can understand it, even push a draft, and then the WG will make the best of all it sees.

Pascal

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com<mailto:abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>>
Date: Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adopting turnon 8138
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org<mailto:roll@ietf.org>>


I don't think it is the right approach, why using the DODAG configuration for compression? this compression turn on/off is not for the DODAG construction but for packets. I think we should separate configurations of the RPL routing standards and of the packet compression standards. We may add another configuration option per DODAG or another way.

What do you think?

AB

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com<mailto:pthubert@cisco.com>> wrote:
Dear all

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03 is a simple draft that completes RFC 8138 with bits in the config option to enable turning it on in an brown field.
There’s no black magic and it would be good to progress it in the background rather than forget it.. Could we consider adoption?

All the best

Pascal
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org<mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org<mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll