Re: [Roll] Trickle-mcast - Proactive Forwarding

Hi Don, Ines,

I agree with Don's statement. It is pretty essential to get routers with 
multiple interfaces working and implement the concept of an admin -local 
scope policy implemented in an automatic fashion.

Peter

Don Sturek schreef op 2014-01-08 20:45:
> Hi Ines,
> 
> I believe it would be useful to have PROACTIVE_FORWARDING per
> interface and not per forwarder. This would allow a device with
> multiple interfaces to operate off of different MPL settings (for
> example, a device that uses MPL in a HAN but also has an AMI interface
> as well in the area of smart metering)
> 
> Don
> 
> From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
> Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
> Date: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 11:30 AM
> To: roll <roll@ietf.org>
> Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "Jonathan Hui (johui)"
> <johui@cisco.com>
> Subject: [Roll] Trickle-mcast - Proactive Forwarding - ticket #103
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We are clossing the issues for trickle-mcast draft, we have still this
> open issue, ticket #103 [1], please we would like to have your opinion
> about this suggestion:
> 
> "...to increase MPL's applicability, PROACTIVE_FORWARDING should be a
> per-interface and not a per-forwarder setting..."
> [http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg08156.html [2]]
> 
> Thank you in advance,
> 
> Ines Robles. _______________________________________________ Roll
> mailing list Roll@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> [3]
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/103
> [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg08156.html
> [3] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

Re: [Roll] Trickle-mcast - Proactive Forwarding - ticket #103