IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] New routing dispatch and RPL

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Thu, 05 November 2015 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8A11B35A2; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:20:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJrH-ZzteAWn; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:20:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC4C1B35A0; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:20:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lbbwb3 with SMTP id wb3so24992155lbb.1; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:20:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hMlPRdhvFSo7GyeaHpgEjy/0QdgNwE0D1GfkjrOgrCU=; b=jrS29I7jBCAh/CYGGIMhEFubhjK6vrXpKage3m81f7yu7e1dMMzVwmfKy7eEpRwlvH VTetwD2cMu2GFaI9vJ6Z7LIDOhHPW+3eI9vWZP2YdzAuUKhhl7IArWlnPYEIOr+lW9UT DmhQHz6sx/cC4ecj/803FPm37BuqkPq/XNzxDkku/jlxXeNmJviEqja1PGL98g9YeKSl r2ip+5Jj2L1Cu6aHXMUSluR4nY8NillwVrW+Yb3fYmDbXvKGQogM7UUjWZ6uiuSUj6sI FUPlxZTq6UCXcD6oetxpTWZ67yUqzl6fYINMohN5H2Je6SPRQoQ1j79RgOgjKbT1vtTK b/xQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.158.98 with SMTP id wt2mr2355284lbb.33.1446686418949; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.151.65 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 03:20:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUd+hY6HbtAcu91E_-=ZcH=bKAh8spZQLQCbkG1a543Jbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c343841a5b9e0523c0eeab"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/5yeJ0Vo6bMpXp_6nyY1AOHaYF9k>
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] New routing dispatch and RPL
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:20:22 -0000

+1

It is good to have a method  to compress RPL Option.

I think you are asking for adoption, not last-call?

Let'see how it can be used for the different uses cases, specifically the
ones that fails

Thanks Pascal for this work


2015-09-16 12:33 GMT+03:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>:

> Dear all:
>
>
>
> We packed pretty much all we got from the meeting(s) in Prague into
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6lo-routing-dispatch-06
>
> Do you see some consequent change we need to make before we ask for last
> call?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email