Re: [Roll] acceptance of individual drafts

koutsiamanis-roll-nsa-estension, ji-roll-traffic-aware-objective function
- have reviewed the document and possibly contribute in the future.

thubert-roll-unaware-leaves, bier-rpl
- haven't reviewed any version, but will review in the future.

Regards,
Rahul
- have read a version. But i On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 at 14:25, Peter van
der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi Roll,
>
> This morning we had several interesting presentations of individual drafts.
> They all fit within the charter of ROLL, and represent worthy subjects.
>
> It would be pleasure to take them in as roll WG documents, provided there is enough interest in the WG to work on the subjects.
>
> Below there is a list of drafts for which I like an answer to the following questions:
> Did you read a version of the document,
> Do you intend to read a version of the document.
> Will you react on the ML concerning the document.
> Are you willing to do a review of the document?
> Will you contribute to the document?
>
> Answering to only one question positively for a subset of the documents is probably sufficient to gauge interest.
>
> The list of drafts is:
> Bier RPL design team document
> rahul-roll-rpl-observation
> koutsiamanis-roll-nsa-estension
> ji-roll-traffic-aware-objective function
> thubert-roll-unaware-leaves
>
>
> For draft rahul-rpl-observation, the consideration that it should go to RFC is no relevant for these questions, because we can use the document extensively in the WG without publishing it in the end.
>
> Thanks for your reactions and contributions.
>
> Peter&Ines
> --
> Peter van der Stok
> vanderstok consultancy
> mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org
> www: www.vanderstok.org
> tel NL: +31(0)492474673     F: +33(0)966015248
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll