IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [6tisch] Suggestion to add Example Packets for 6TiSCH Configuration into useofrplinfo draft

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Tue, 18 July 2017 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57D5131D2B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aFUU969AbxNV for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CA21120227 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([IPv6:2001:888:0:22:194:109:20:211]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id m8W71v00v5LLN1B018W8eh; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:30:14 +0200
Received: from 2001:67c:1232:144:9016:6f55:5e12:75b8 by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:30:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:30:07 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Cc: roll <roll@ietf.org>, 6tisch@ietf.org, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUetFuxV+QHGev_GniU2f0R8F75R26uah=zdooPQ7i_emQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUetFuxV+QHGev_GniU2f0R8F75R26uah=zdooPQ7i_emQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <65ebd4a8922641c33865871d76e94c10@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/B4oe3qQUhvi6GhjfmJNGF69QBl4>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6tisch] Suggestion to add Example Packets for 6TiSCH Configuration into useofrplinfo draft
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:30:23 -0000

Hi Ines,

I don't see the relation between the examples and the rplinfo draft.
RPLinfo is about routes through the DODAG and the use of IP-in-IP and 
RPI.
The examples do not reflect that topic in my opinion.

Peter

Ines  Robles schreef op 2017-07-18 10:19:
> Dear all,
> 
> Yesterday at 6tisch meeting was suggested to add this document,
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-munoz-6tisch-examples-02
> 
> as an Appendix section in useofrplinfo draft.
> 
> We would like to know your opinion on that,
> 
> - Should we add this draft as an appendix? or
> 
> - Should this draft be presented in lwig? or
> 
> - Additional Suggestions?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> The authors.
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email