Re: [Roll] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 19 August 2021 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C7E3A0404; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ncWBIP0v-0bm; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFF383A0402; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:79f4:9f94:3f3a:6e16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB3EA600370; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:01:29 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1629360090; bh=eDAjv7ZvQcL5Abv/tMF1iwVsn0ju9yk/wFQV5TE01vI=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=odokVuUsna65y+0At33KCW+YX0iU9UvHHTH+kB1firVZp9rqZkfZjSxsbaO3v2QwK MzVZOfun7iPSsFUvQ+gedozSkfN8AU/YdrPd5qITSjTC9bmbw2JJXvLM/FOD5FJcOO ip0FodLFuvYDNWM4cfPATCwQekCxnPPWfOe2urIw=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <AED9B938-83B4-4935-BCAF-BA3E1EF922BA@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D6DE696B-6B76-4B5F-938B-38A0BC9CB1DF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:01:28 +0300
In-Reply-To: <24245546-4508-801a-83d0-5a3776288048@lupinlodge.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl@ietf.org, roll-chairs@ietf.org, roll@ietf.org, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
To: Charles Perkins <charliep@lupinlodge.com>
References: <161841517905.8620.14903415282133221941@ietfa.amsl.com> <24245546-4508-801a-83d0-5a3776288048@lupinlodge.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: EB3EA600370.A4DD2
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Ez0YnOfX7JnHYbyuWVRTEqCLMWg>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 08:01:48 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-8-18, at 23:06, Charles Perkins <charliep@lupinlodge.com> wrote:
> Please excuse the unusually long delay it has taken for us to respond to your comments.

 no worries. I just came back from vacation myself and would not have responded earlier anyway.

> > Section 2, paragraph 1, comment:
> >> 2.  Terminology
> 
> > Is there some logic as to which terms are capitalized and which are not? (Also
> > in the text.)
> 
> It is meant to improve the readability by selectively capitalizing certain
> terms what we felt appropriate.  This is often very subjective.  Do you have
> any suggestions for improvement?

I found the capitalization applied inconsistently, and found that confusing. I'd suggest to either consistently capitalize or  - rather - not to capitalize at all.

Thanks,
Lars