[Roll] FW: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-02.txt

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Tue, 13 May 2014 09:26 UTC

From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPboxRAM7nFZ++3UC8TcXZbob1AZs+O9Fg
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:26:16 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:26:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842658563@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <20140513091837.28963.29591.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140513091837.28963.29591.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/G5ixtXceOmwKM9jrHeyAUSfrBHA
Cc: roll <roll@ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, Pat Kinney <pat.kinney@KINNEYCONSULTINGLLC.COM>
Subject: [Roll] FW: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-02.txt
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>

Dear all:

This new version addresses Brian's concerns, in particular the language that relates this proposal with the Flow Label Specification (RFC 6437).
It is made clearer that this is a deviation such as already tolerated for security reasons, and that the compelling reason is energy saving.
The proposal only impacts the use of the flow label inside the LLN and does not result in a deterioration of the application of RFC 6437 inside the Internet. 
The proposal is supported by individuals participating to LLN related groups at the IETF (cc'ed) and external SDOs (ISA100).

The question is now whether we should complete the work at 6MAN or move back to ROLL.

What do you think?

Pascal


-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: mardi 13 mai 2014 11:19
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert); Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-02.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl
Revision:	02
Title:		The IPv6 Flow Label within a RPL domain
Document date:	2014-05-13
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		11
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-02.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-02
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-02

Abstract:
   This document present how the Flow Label can be used inside a RPL
   domain as a replacement to the RPL option and provides rules for the
   root to set and reset the Flow Label when forwarding between the
   inside of RPL domain and the larger Internet, in both direction.
   This new operation saves 44 bits in each frame, and an eventual IP-
   in-IP encapsulation within the RPL domain that is required for all
   packets that reach outside of the RPL domain.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

[Roll] FW: New Version Notification for draft-thu… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: [Roll] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Roll] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)