IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-02 (proposed text)

"Jonathan Hui (johui)" <johui@cisco.com> Fri, 03 August 2012 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <johui@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E15121F8E2B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_SUMOF=5, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uE2EoKosEbye for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900A421F8DEC for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=johui@cisco.com; l=60144; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1344016096; x=1345225696; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Etw9KMTyCudo3NZup1AkhBr6PeFXIYxdzozY0X8vEGI=; b=goVdX7IfwHm11SbZBSdZAzy7/4viR3sBQRYrYRPTSUxpuOOIhCZ5uoc3 hRUV39OCy7vUDvR1tRgBYgCyBhhzuQnV3VTaSRTQIfq9u6uCx3yDYsgVX Fu8kanWaBxxmD43PbhDgorkxGnIgeyxumEdYKnlktRyEfd3tA82B9K2fU M=;
X-Files: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-new.txt : 42863
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAE4OHFCtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABCA7kugQeCJxIBBwFMIAQBUBkXJwQKCQ4Uh2sLmzKBKKAiBItEFAEFAYNIgkFgA45ZhnGBFI0TgWaCX4FWAQg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,707,1336348800"; d="txt'?scan'208"; a="108295515"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Aug 2012 17:48:13 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q73HmCYv025229 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:48:12 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.162]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 12:48:12 -0500
From: "Jonathan Hui (johui)" <johui@cisco.com>
To: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-02 (proposed text)
Thread-Index: AQHNcaAmVDiypUQcCEeYvwAemcuHJw==
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:48:11 +0000
Message-ID: <5871F86F-9CC3-4DBB-8778-9A9FFE0B6CB2@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.86.210]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19082.002
x-tm-as-result: No--30.593500-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_5871F86F9CC34DBB87789A9FFE0B6CB2ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Roll] draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-02 (proposed text)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:48:20 -0000

We've been working on an update to draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast.  I've attached a draft of the proposed text.  Note that we will *not* be presenting this draft at the ROLL WG meeting.

In a prior mail, I noted some deficiencies with the initial draft that was posted.  We will discuss some of these deficiencies at the ROLL WG meeting today.  The purpose of this mail is to give you some insight into solving those deficiencies as well as incorporating suggestions that were brought up on the list.  If you get a chance to glance through before the WG meeting, great.  In either case, let's continue the discussion on the list.

Always looking for your feedback, especially from implementors.

Thanks!

--
Jonathan Hui

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email