IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 11 June 2017 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFF2129A9C for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 11:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.34, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I8qSZEkQTM37 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB5D129A97 for <roll@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [209.87.249.16]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 651C21F930; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 18:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 668A22259; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 10:48:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <ebb0f86536d0f59816c5270080a7fcb9@xs4all.nl>
References: <6352.1494433492@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <D5388F92.3AF0C%d.sturek@att.net> <ebb0f86536d0f59816c5270080a7fcb9@xs4all.nl>
Comments: In-reply-to peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> message dated "Thu, 11 May 2017 09:52:14 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 10:48:24 -0400
Message-ID: <10782.1497106104@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/IybGTSLNSo8l574Bhy7eFhZnRDY>
Subject: Re: [Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 18:16:17 -0000

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> wrote:
    > I got the clear impression that the draft needs thorough re-writing
    > anyway.  That being the case and noticing that reviewers have problems
    > to get to the end of the document, I wanted to suggest the following
    > re-ordering.  One use-case which describes the longest trajectory from
    > outside, to inside, and outside the RPL LAN, decomposed in parts, say,
    > a,b,c,d All the other use cases just tables with their composition of
    > parts in the wanted order.

Ines and I are working on revisions: this includes changing the RPI code!

I would like to know from the WG if this decomposition would satisfy?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email