[Roll] RPL RFC 6550 - Path Control Example - Comments
Federico Consoli <admin@ipv6it.org> Thu, 29 March 2012 12:34 UTC
Return-Path: <admin@ipv6it.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138D921F8ACC for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEjX4F+RPKYA for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EB421F8AC3 for <Roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eeke51 with SMTP id e51so1163523eek.31 for <Roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=Pu+6AQFmXxVXaFs0gaZdbqkwHOlOQeX52KMVdPxmEdY=; b=F1KplELkIIU/DNAfQKBExIdnt4IMHM8JuukN2NsWta+Xfoa77VAptkQYfq+XlCY8Vc /y/huTrUMTyrVV+t/0izY9oKJP8KhxPqoS4BWUPI/zYBsWB54DPIES4FmHHBjRXuMUJ8 gd6QImGSG13CzwWYaKULVsNufXtjoIwvHx2jCzfBSHC93+stjv0Rw5CFUpD7E1Q6WtCV 712XJIKqbaumIPLN8ofS1xSJ6XrAST6+WUWPLMEQ8Vsbger1GIGr7UoNsr1bF8Y3cvZ4 LspJThJ5hxHTz40QidrDFX9Z4gooVTEKmyPxwjDsOZl3KP9bQ5EZS5SgbUVeHwVZB2gF kLTQ==
Received: by 10.213.22.201 with SMTP id o9mr983677ebb.110.1333024450799; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (myskyn.iet.unipi.it. [131.114.59.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y11sm20817891eem.3.2012.03.29.05.34.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F7456BF.9000204@ipv6it.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:34:07 +0200
From: Federico Consoli <admin@ipv6it.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roll@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk86GOEbz5ueY9QqS6jGnV6g3p4i+BjmaxnY38ZL7eb+sKExyTeS/qCnaRJBL1UO8xtqecO
Subject: [Roll] RPL RFC 6550 - Path Control Example - Comments
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:34:13 -0000
Hi, I have a doubt regarding the Path Control Example. From Section 9.9.1 "1. Let C1 send a DAO containing a Target T with a Path Control 10000000b. Node N stores an entry associating 10000000b with the Path Control field for C1 and Target T. " And that's ok. "2. Let C2 send a DAO containing a Target T with a Path Control 00010000b. Node N stores an entry associating 00010000b with the Path Control field for C1 and Target T." Why C1? I think that it should be C2. "3. Let C3 send a DAO containing a Target T with a Path Control 00001100b. Node N stores an entry associating 00001100b with the Path Control field for C1 and Target T." Same issue. I think that it should be C3. -- Regards Consoli Federico
- [Roll] RPL RFC 6550 - Path Control Example - Comm… Federico Consoli