[Roll] [roll] #147: Unclear when the M flag should be cleared or set

"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Mon, 10 February 2014 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9271A0842 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:32:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dRl5DHc0-vte for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:32:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4775B1A02FA for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:32:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34270 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1WCrVX-00089N-L1; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:06:47 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: roll issue tracker <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast@tools.ietf.org, mariainesrobles@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:06:47 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/147
Message-ID: <067.b6d891fd0f9fd5f4ea28762de50609f7@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 147
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast@tools.ietf.org, mariainesrobles@gmail.com, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: jonhui@cisco.com, richard.kelsey@silabs.com
Resent-To: jonhui@cisco.com, richard.kelsey@silabs.com
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] [roll] #147: Unclear when the M flag should be cleared or set
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:32:41 -0000

#147: Unclear when the M flag should be cleared or set

 Thread: ​​http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg08473.html

 From: Axel Colin de Verdière <axel-ietf at axelcdv.com> Date: Sat, 8 Feb
 2014 01:26:50 +0100

 - In section 9.2, it is unclear when the M flag should be cleared or set:
 why would it be arbitrarily cleared and not indicate whether or not this
 message's sequence number is the largest one received?

-- 
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Reporter:                           |      Owner:  draft-ietf-roll-
  mariainesrobles@gmail.com          |  trickle-mcast@tools.ietf.org
     Type:  defect                   |     Status:  new
 Priority:  major                    |  Milestone:
Component:  trickle-mcast            |    Version:
 Severity:  In WG Last Call          |   Keywords:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/147>
roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>