[Roll] draft-roux-roll-mpl-eval-00.txt
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 24 December 2013 19:34 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAE41AE017 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:34:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0dBuNCBhrWu for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:34:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE981AE015 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:34:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AD12002F; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:48:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 9DBCD647D0; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:34:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3EF63B88; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:34:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: draft-roux-roll-mpl-eval@tools.ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:34:11 -0500
Message-ID: <23888.1387913651@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] draft-roux-roll-mpl-eval-00.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 19:34:32 -0000
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-roux-roll-mpl-eval/ was recently posted, with the abstract: Abstract This draft presents simulation work and first results related to MPL performance evaluation. The simulation makes it possible to evaluate MPL performances in the context of a large network. The simulated network introduces 500 nodes. The general principles of the simulator are described. Then reference settings are introduced, and evaluation indicators are proposed. Finally preliminary results are presented under the form of a few tables, that show the proposed indicator values depending on some specific parameter which is used as a variable argument. Among various results, the advantage of using reactive mode for MPL is shown in terms of the capability to maintain loss free diffusion in harsh radio conditions. ==== I've read the document, and I like the direction which it is going. It would be interesting to have feedback from deployments about how accurate the random placement matches real life: I think that real life won't be random at all! The ROLL charter hardly mentions MPL at all; so having an experience draft on it, is neither here nor there. ** May I ask what the authors intend for this document? Do you think that the additional work will occur prior to IETF90, and might be feedback into possible re-chartering of ROLL? I think that it is very useful for the technology to have a rigorous analysis of MPL like this, and very useful for standardization to have some clear advice on setting the parameters. Is the software used in this simulation available for others to play with? I'm concerned that this is a particularly academic paper, and might get the kind of peer review that I think it deserves as an ID (vs a submission to a journal). -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works IETF ROLL WG co-chair. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
- [Roll] draft-roux-roll-mpl-eval-00.txt Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] draft-roux-roll-mpl-eval-00.txt Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] draft-roux-roll-mpl-eval-00.txt ROUX Pierre